Literature DB >> 20452366

Failures of sustained attention in life, lab, and brain: ecological validity of the SART.

Daniel Smilek1, Jonathan S A Carriere, J Allan Cheyne.   

Abstract

The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) is a widely used tool in cognitive neuroscience increasingly employed to identify brain regions associated with failures of sustained attention. An important claim of the SART is that it is significantly related to real-world problems of sustained attention such as those experienced by TBI and ADHD patients. This claim is largely based on its association with the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), but recently concerns have been expressed about the reliability of the SART-CFQ association. Based on a review of the literature, meta-analysis of prior research, and analysis of original data, we conclude that, across studies sampling diverse populations and contexts, the SART is reliably associated with the CFQ. The CFQ-SART relation also holds for patients with TBI. We note, however, conceptual limitations of using the CFQ, which was designed as a measure of general cognitive failures, to validate the SART, which was specifically designed to assess sustained attention. To remedy this limitation, we report on associations between the SART and a specific Attention-Related Cognitive Errors Scale (ARCES) and a Mindful Awareness of Attention Scale-Lapses Only (MAAS-LO). Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20452366     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  41 in total

Review 1.  Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Stress Regulation of Sustained Attention and the Cholinergic Attention System.

Authors:  Samantha R Eck; Song-Jun Xu; Alexander Telenson; Michael R Duggan; Robert Cole; Brittany Wicks; Joy Bergmann; Hanna Lefebo; Marni Shore; Katherine A Shepard; Michael R Akins; Vinay Parikh; Elizabeth A Heller; Debra A Bangasser
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Ear-catching? Real-world distractibility scores predict susceptibility to auditory attentional capture.

Authors:  Sandra Murphy; Polly Dalton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

4.  Dynamic brain network configurations during rest and an attention task with frequent occurrence of mind wandering.

Authors:  Ekaterina Denkova; Jason S Nomi; Lucina Q Uddin; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Nicotine deprivation influences P300 markers of cognitive control.

Authors:  David E Evans; Nathan D Maxfield; Kate Janse Van Rensburg; Jason A Oliver; Kade G Jentink; David J Drobes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Missed targets, reaction times, and arousal are related to trait anxiety and attention to pain during an experimental vigilance task with a painful target.

Authors:  Nichole M Emerson; Timothy J Meeker; Joel D Greenspan; Mark I Saffer; Claudia M Campbell; Anna Korzeniewska; Fred A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Individual differences in sustained attention are associated with cortical thickness.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; David Rothlein; Victoria Poole; Meghan Robinson; Regina McGlinchey; Joseph DeGutis; David Salat; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Method for testing sustained attention in touchscreen operant chambers in rats.

Authors:  Brittany Wicks; David E Waxler; Kyle M White; Nina Duncan; Joy Bergmann; Robert D Cole; Vinay Parikh; Debra A Bangasser
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Cortical activity differs during nicotine deprivation versus satiation in heavy smokers.

Authors:  David E Evans; Steven K Sutton; Jason A Oliver; David J Drobes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task (SAT) for Rats.

Authors:  Debra A Bangasser; Brittany Wicks; David E Waxler; Samantha R Eck
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.