BACKGROUND: Sustained attention, the ability to detect rare and unpredictable events, is central to cognitive performance. This construct can be tested in rodents using a Sustained Attention Task (SAT), where rats are trained to detect an unpredictably occurring signal (a brief light presentation) from non-signal events. The traditional version of this task utilizes an operant chamber with a central panel light for the signal and two retractable response levers. Adaptation of SAT to the increasingly popular touchscreen operant chambers, which do not have levers or fixed lights, could enhance the versatility of the task. NEW METHOD: Here we developed a touchscreen version of SAT where the light signal is presented in the center of the touchscreen, followed by a tone to indicate the beginning of the response period. Rats indicate their choice during this period by touching their nose to one of two touchscreen response areas. The remaining parameters were kept similar to the traditional version. RESULTS: Rats acquired touchscreen SAT at a similar rate to the traditional version. As with the traditional version, shorter stimulus durations on the signaled trials reduced accuracy and the presence of a distractor (a flashing houselight) disrupted performance on the touchscreen version. COMPARISON TO EXISTING METHOD: Collectively, these data suggest that the touchscreen version is comparable to the traditional version of the SAT, and is an equally valid way of measuring sustained attention. CONCLUSIONS: Many researchers with touchscreen chambers could easily implement our modifications in order to study sustained attention.
BACKGROUND: Sustained attention, the ability to detect rare and unpredictable events, is central to cognitive performance. This construct can be tested in rodents using a Sustained Attention Task (SAT), where rats are trained to detect an unpredictably occurring signal (a brief light presentation) from non-signal events. The traditional version of this task utilizes an operant chamber with a central panel light for the signal and two retractable response levers. Adaptation of SAT to the increasingly popular touchscreen operant chambers, which do not have levers or fixed lights, could enhance the versatility of the task. NEW METHOD: Here we developed a touchscreen version of SAT where the light signal is presented in the center of the touchscreen, followed by a tone to indicate the beginning of the response period. Rats indicate their choice during this period by touching their nose to one of two touchscreen response areas. The remaining parameters were kept similar to the traditional version. RESULTS:Rats acquired touchscreen SAT at a similar rate to the traditional version. As with the traditional version, shorter stimulus durations on the signaled trials reduced accuracy and the presence of a distractor (a flashing houselight) disrupted performance on the touchscreen version. COMPARISON TO EXISTING METHOD: Collectively, these data suggest that the touchscreen version is comparable to the traditional version of the SAT, and is an equally valid way of measuring sustained attention. CONCLUSIONS: Many researchers with touchscreen chambers could easily implement our modifications in order to study sustained attention.
Authors: Lisa A Briand; Shelly B Flagel; M Julia Garcia-Fuster; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil; Martin Sarter; Terry E Robinson Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Vinay Parikh; William M Howe; Ryan M Welchko; Sean X Naughton; Drew E D'Amore; Daniel H Han; Monika Deo; David L Turner; Martin Sarter Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Samantha R Eck; Song-Jun Xu; Alexander Telenson; Michael R Duggan; Robert Cole; Brittany Wicks; Joy Bergmann; Hanna Lefebo; Marni Shore; Katherine A Shepard; Michael R Akins; Vinay Parikh; Elizabeth A Heller; Debra A Bangasser Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 13.382