Literature DB >> 20452178

Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Harlan C Amstutz1, Lauren E Wisk, Michel J Le Duff.   

Abstract

Short-term to midterm results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty suggest various contraindications, in particular the female sex. This study evaluates survivorship and clinical outcomes of a large patient cohort to determine whether sex itself has a detrimental effect on the results of hip resurfacing. We compared the clinical and survivorship results of men and women from a series of 1107 resurfaced hips in 923 patients (681 males and 242 females). Women saw greater positive changes in walking, function, and the mental component of the Short Form-12. There was no difference in complication rates between men and women. Although the revision rate was higher in the women's group, the effect of sex disappeared when adjusted for component size and surgical technique. These data suggest that there is no appreciable effect of sex on implant survivorship and that women may be excellent candidates for resurfacing with proper surgical technique. This is a level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20452178     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

1.  Reply to letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Bryan D Haughom; Brandon J Erickson; Michael D Hellman; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Régis Pailhé; Akash Sharma; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac; Philippe Chiron; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bryan D Haughom; Brandon J Erickson; Michael D Hellman; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Are there benefits to one- versus two-stage procedures in bilateral hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Edwin P Su; Michel J Le Duff; Vincent A Fowble
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Socket position determines hip resurfacing 10-year survivorship.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

9.  Conversion of a failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jacob A Haynes; Jeffrey B Stambough; Robert L Barrack; Denis Nam
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

10.  Sex differences in the morphological failure patterns following hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Hinsch; Eik Vettorazzi; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Rüther; Michael Amling; Jozef Zustin
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.