Literature DB >> 20452169

Evaluation of quality of life after breast reconstruction using an autologous latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap.

E De Gournay1, F Bonnetain, H Tixier, C Loustalot, S Dabakuyo, J Cuisenier.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction using the autologous latissimus dorsi technique and the impact of the procedure on the quality of life and body image of women who had mastectomy for breast cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective transversal study was conducted at the Georges François Leclerc Cancer Care Center in Dijon, France. From 1990 to 2008, 193 women underwent reconstruction (RW), among these, 141 were matched for age at diagnosis and the date of the mastectomy with women who did not undergo reconstruction (NRW) identified using data from the Côte d'Or breast cancer registry. Questionnaires concerning quality of life, body image and satisfaction (MBROS-S, MBROS-BI, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23) were sent through the post following surgery.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 77% and the mean (MBROS-S) satisfaction score was 3.36. The quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23) in RW was no better than that in NRW, but body image was better (p = 0.0247) especially before 60 years (p = 0.0192), in obese patients (p = 0.03) and when the breasts of RW were heavy (p = 0.0197). Moreover, when the time from the mastectomy was less than 4 years, body image (p = 0.0008) and the sexual activity score (p = 0.0078) were higher in RW.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of satisfaction was higher in RW, and breast reconstruction made a strong contribution in terms of improvement in body image. A prospective study to evaluate quality of life in the long term is now necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20452169     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  9 in total

1.  Response shift effects on measuring post-operative quality of life among breast cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  T S Dabakuyo; F Guillemin; T Conroy; M Velten; D Jolly; M Mercier; S Causeret; J Cuisenier; O Graesslin; M Gauthier; F Bonnetain
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Z Cordova; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-08

3.  Physical side-effects following breast reconstructive surgery impact physical activity and function.

Authors:  Deirdre E McGhee; Julie R Steele
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Body Image in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carly L Paterson; Cecile A Lengacher; Kristine A Donovan; Kevin E Kip; Cindy S Tofthagen
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 5.  Outcomes in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Implant-Based Reconstruction: Does Age Really Matter?

Authors:  Lauren V Kuykendall; Angie Zhang; Bugra Tugertimur; Sara Bijan; Corin Agoris; Ambuj Kumar; Deniz Dayicioglu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  The musculoskeletal consequences of latissmus dorsi breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicole E Blackburn; Joseph G Mc Veigh; Eilis M Mc Caughan; Richard D Kennedy; Stuart A McIntosh; Iseult M Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Influence of Functional Shoulder Biomechanics as a Mediator of Patient-Reported Outcomes following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Joshua M Leonardis; Daniel A Lyons; Kelley M Kidwell; Aviram M Giladi; David B Lipps; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.169

8.  Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Deanna Attai; Dunya Atisha; Peter Beitsch; Linda Bosserman; Judy Boughey; Jodi Carter; Stephen Edge; Sheldon Feldman; Joshua Froman; Caprice Greenberg; Cary Kaufman; Monica Morrow; Barbara Pockaj; Melvin Silverstein; Lawrence Solin; Alicia Staley; Frank Vicini; Lee Wilke; Wei Yang; Hiram Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Keystone Perforator Island Flap for Postmastectomy Defect Resurfacing in Late-stage Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Irena Sakura Rini; Made Ananda Krisna; Jenisa Kamayana; Kasih Rahardjo Djarot; Alberta Jesslyn Gunardi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.