Literature DB >> 20451677

Volumetric analysis of osteoclastic bioresorption of calcium phosphate ceramics with different solubilities.

T Winkler1, E Hoenig, R Gildenhaar, G Berger, D Fritsch, R Janssen, M M Morlock, A F Schilling.   

Abstract

Commonly, to determine osteoclastic resorption of biomaterials only the resorbed area is measured. The depth of the resorption pit, however, may also be important for the performance of a material. To generate such data we used two calcium phosphate ceramics (Ca(10) and Ca(2)). The solubility of the materials was determined according to DIN EN ISO 10993-14. They were scanned three-dimensionally using infinite focus microscopy and subsequently cultivated for 4 weeks in simulated body fluid without (control) or with human osteoclasts. After this cultivation period osteoclasts number was determined and surface changes were evaluated two- and three-dimensionally. Ca(10) and Ca(2) showed solubilities of 11.0+/-0.5 and 23.0+/-2.2 mgg(-1), respectively. Both materials induced a significant increase in osteoclast number. While Ca(10) did not show osteoclastic resorption, Ca(2) showed an increased pit area and pit volume due to osteoclastic action. This was caused by an increased average pit depth and an increased number of pits, while the average area of single pits did not change significantly. The deduced volumetric osteoclastic resorption rate (vORR) of Ca(2) (0.01-0.02 microm(3)microm(-2)day(-1)) was lower than the remodelling speed observed in vivo (0.08 microm(3)microm(-2)day(-1)), which is in line with the observation that implanted resorbable materials remain in the body longer than originally expected. Determination of volumetric indices of osteoclastic resorption might be valuable in obtaining additional information about cellular resorption of bone substitute materials. This may help facilitate the development of novel materials for bone substitution. 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20451677     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  6 in total

Review 1.  Injectable foams for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Edna M Prieto; Jonathan M Page; Andrew J Harmata; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11

2.  D-amino acid inhibits biofilm but not new bone formation in an ovine model.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Yun Ma; Carlos J Sanchez; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Florent Elefteriou; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Biological properties of calcium phosphate biomaterials for bone repair: a review.

Authors:  Jingyi Lu; Huijun Yu; Chuanzhong Chen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Biodegradable poly (lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds as carriers for genetically-modified fibroblasts.

Authors:  Tatjana Perisic; Ziyang Zhang; Peter Foehr; Ursula Hopfner; Kathrin Klutz; Rainer H Burgkart; Alexei Slobodianski; Moritz Goeldner; Hans-Günther Machens; Arndt F Schilling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Percutaneous cyst aspiration with injection of two different bioresorbable bone cements in treatment of simple bone cyst.

Authors:  Chao Dong; Peter Klimek; Christof Abächerli; Vincenzo De Rosa; Andreas H Krieg
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 6.  Current State of Bone Adhesives-Necessities and Hurdles.

Authors:  Kai O Böker; Katharina Richter; Katharina Jäckle; Shahed Taheri; Ingo Grunwald; Kai Borcherding; Janek von Byern; Andreas Hartwig; Britt Wildemann; Arndt F Schilling; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.