Literature DB >> 26201421

D-amino acid inhibits biofilm but not new bone formation in an ovine model.

Andrew J Harmata1,2, Yun Ma2,3, Carlos J Sanchez4, Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz1, Florent Elefteriou2,3,5, Joseph C Wenke4, Scott A Guelcher6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications of musculoskeletal trauma are an important factor contributing to patient morbidity. Biofilm-dispersive bone grafts augmented with D-amino acids (D-AAs) prevent biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo, but the effects of D-AAs on osteocompatibility and new bone formation have not been investigated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Do D-AAs hinder osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in vitro? (2) Does local delivery of D-AAs from low-viscosity bone grafts inhibit new bone formation in a large-animal model?
METHODS: Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus clinical isolates, mouse bone marrow stromal cells, and osteoclast precursor cells were treated with an equal mass (1:1:1) mixture of D-Pro:D-Met:D-Phe. The effects of the D-AA dose on biofilm inhibition (n = 4), biofilm dispersion (n = 4), and bone marrow stromal cell proliferation (n = 3) were quantitatively measured by crystal violet staining. Osteoblast differentiation was quantitatively assessed by alkaline phosphatase staining, von Kossa staining, and quantitative reverse transcription for the osteogenic factors a1Col1 and Ocn (n = 3). Osteoclast differentiation was quantitatively measured by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining (n = 3). Bone grafts augmented with 0 or 200 mmol/L D-AAs were injected in ovine femoral condyle defects in four sheep. New bone formation was evaluated by μCT and histology 4 months later. An a priori power analysis indicated that a sample size of four would detect a 7.5% difference of bone volume/total volume between groups assuming a mean and SD of 30% and 5%, respectively, with a power of 80% and an alpha level of 0.05 using a two-tailed t-test between the means of two independent samples.
RESULTS: Bone marrow stromal cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclast differentiation were inhibited at D-AAs concentrations of 27 mmol/L or greater in a dose-responsive manner in vitro (p < 0.05). In methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S aureus clinical isolates, D-AAs inhibited biofilm formation at concentrations of 13.5 mmol/L or greater in vitro (p < 0.05). Local delivery of D-AAs from low-viscosity grafts did not inhibit new bone formation in a large-animal model pilot study (0 mmol/L D-AAs: bone volume/total volume = 26.9% ± 4.1%; 200 mmol/L D-AAs: bone volume/total volume = 28.3% ± 15.4%; mean difference with 95% CI = -1.4; p = 0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: D-AAs inhibit biofilm formation, bone marrow stromal cell proliferation, osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclast differentiation in vitro in a dose-responsive manner. Local delivery of D-AAs from bone grafts did not inhibit new bone formation in vivo at clinically relevant doses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Local delivery of D-AAs is an effective antibiofilm strategy that does not appear to inhibit bone repair. Longitudinal studies investigating bacterial burden, bone formation, and bone remodeling in contaminated defects as a function of D-AA dose are required to further support the use of D-AAs in the clinical management of infected open fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26201421      PMCID: PMC4626484          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4465-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  53 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of infections associated with combat-related extremity injuries.

Authors:  Clinton K Murray; William T Obremskey; Joseph R Hsu; Romney C Andersen; Jason H Calhoun; Jon C Clasper; Timothy J Whitman; Thomas K Curry; Mark E Fleming; Joseph C Wenke; James R Ficke
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-08

2.  Effects of local delivery of D-amino acids from biofilm-dispersive scaffolds on infection in contaminated rat segmental defects.

Authors:  Carlos J Sanchez; Edna M Prieto; Chad A Krueger; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Desiree R Romano; Catherine L Ward; Kevin S Akers; Scott A Guelcher; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Complications associated with internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incision technique.

Authors:  David P Barei; Sean E Nork; William J Mills; M Bradford Henley; Stephen K Benirschke
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Tryptophan inhibits biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Kenneth S Brandenburg; Karien J Rodriguez; Jonathan F McAnulty; Christopher J Murphy; Nicholas L Abbott; Michael J Schurr; Charles J Czuprynski
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Staphylococcus aureus induces expression of receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand and prostaglandin E2 in infected murine osteoblasts.

Authors:  Shankari N Somayaji; Samantha Ritchie; Mahnaz Sahraei; Ian Marriott; Michael C Hudson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  In vitro study of the metabolic effects of D-amino acids.

Authors:  N Ercal; X Luo; R H Matthews; D W Armstrong
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.437

7.  Metaphyseal fracture healing in a sheep model of low turnover osteoporosis induced by hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection (HPD).

Authors:  Ronny Bindl; Ralf Oheim; Pia Pogoda; Frank Timo Beil; Katharina Gruchenberg; Sandra Reitmaier; Tim Wehner; Enrico Calcia; Peter Radermacher; Lutz Claes; Michael Amling; Anita Ignatius
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Early wound complications after operative treatment of high energy tibial plateau fractures through two incisions.

Authors:  Steven N Shah; Madhav A Karunakar
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2007

9.  RNAIII-inhibiting peptide enhances healing of wounds infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Oriana Simonetti; Oscar Cirioni; Roberto Ghiselli; Gaia Goteri; Alessandro Scalise; Fiorenza Orlando; Carmela Silvestri; Alessandra Riva; Vittorio Saba; Kiran D Madanahally; Annamaria Offidani; Naomi Balaban; Giorgio Scalise; Andrea Giacometti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Balancing the rates of new bone formation and polymer degradation enhances healing of weight-bearing allograft/polyurethane composites in rabbit femoral defects.

Authors:  Jerald E Dumas; Edna M Prieto; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Teja Guda; Joseph C Wenke; Jesse Bible; Ginger E Holt; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.845

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): antibiotic-resistance and the biofilm phenotype.

Authors:  Kelly M Craft; Johny M Nguyen; Lawrence J Berg; Steven D Townsend
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.597

2.  Bacterial d-amino acids suppress sinonasal innate immunity through sweet taste receptors in solitary chemosensory cells.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Benjamin M Hariri; Derek B McMahon; Bei Chen; Laurel Doghramji; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; David W Kennedy; Peihua Jiang; Robert F Margolskee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 3.  [The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update].

Authors:  C Scheuermann-Poley; C Wagner; J Hoffmann; A Moter; C Willy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms on Human Dentin.

Authors:  Eyal Rosen; Igor Tsesis; Shlomo Elbahary; Nimrod Storzi; Ilana Kolodkin-Gal
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Approaches to Dispersing Medical Biofilms.

Authors:  Derek Fleming; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  Lysostaphin and BMP-2 co-delivery reduces S. aureus infection and regenerates critical-sized segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Christopher T Johnson; Mary Caitlin P Sok; Karen E Martin; Pranav P Kalelkar; Jeremy D Caplin; Edward A Botchwey; Andrés J García
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 7.  Current therapies in treatment and prevention of fracture wound biofilms: why a multifaceted approach is essential for resolving persistent infections.

Authors:  Krystle A Blanchette; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 8.  Malnutrition and Fracture Healing: Are Specific Deficiencies in Amino Acids Important in Nonunion Development?

Authors:  Dennis M Meesters; Karolina A P Wijnands; Peter R G Brink; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.