Literature DB >> 20449795

Role of low-mechanical index CEUS in the differentiation between low and high grade bladder carcinoma: a pilot study.

F M Drudi1, V Cantisani, M Liberatore, F Iori, S M Erturk, C Cristini, G Di Pierro, U D'Ambrosio, F Malpassini, C De Felice, N Di Leo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of low-mechanical index contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the differentiation of a series of histologically proven bladder lesions identified via conventional cystoscopy and biopsied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 patients (mean age: 62 years; range 45 - 72 years) with bladder lesions previously detected by color power Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) were prospectively examined with low-mechanical index contrast-enhanced US after bolus administration of 2.4 ml of Sonovue (Bracco, Milan, Italy). All lesions were evaluated in real-time continuous scanning for 2 minutes and the videos were registered. Two ultrasound (US) experts evaluated the videos by consensus and assigned a score to the enhancement pattern. Subsequently, a specific sonographic quantification software (Qontrast, Bracco, Milan, Italy) based on pixel by pixel signal intensity over time was used to obtain contrast-enhanced sonographic perfusion maps for each lesion. Time-intensity curves (TICs) of each lesion were then extracted from the region of interest positioned within the lesion and in the closest bladder wall. The sensitivity and specificity of CDUS and CEUS were compared using McNemar's test. All patients subsequently underwent conventional cystoscopy with biopsy or transurethral resection.
RESULTS: 22 high-grade and 14 low-grade transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) were histologically diagnosed (mean diameter 2.1 cm; range: 1 - 4.5 cm). The sensitivity and specificity of CDUS were 86.4% (19 / 22; 95% CI = 66.7 - 95.3%) and 42.9% (6 / 14; 95% CI = 21.4 - 67.4%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 90.9% (20 / 22; 95% CI = 72.2 - 97.5%) and 85.7% (12 / 14; 95% CI = 60.1 - 95.9%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS using TICs were 95.4% (21 / 22; 95% CI = 78.2 - 99.2%) and 85.7% (12 / 14; 95% CI = 60.1 - 95.9%), respectively. There was no significant difference between the sensitivity of CDUS versus CEUS, CDUS versus TIC, and CEUS versus TIC (p > 0.05; McNemar's test). The specificity of CEUS and TIC was significantly higher than that of CDUS (p < 0.05; McNemar test).
CONCLUSION: CEUS is a reliable noninvasive method for differentiating low- and high-grade bladder carcinomas since it provides typical enhancement patterns as well as specific contrast-sonographic perfusion curves. However, further studies involving larger patient populations is mandatory to confirm these promising results. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20449795     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  9 in total

1.  Role of color Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of renal transplantation from living donors.

Authors:  Francesco Maria Drudi; Mauro Liberatore; Vito Cantisani; Flavio Malpassini; Fabrizio Maghella; Nicola Di Leo; David Fasciolo; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-05-01

2.  CEUS in the study of bladder, method, administration and evaluation, a technical note.

Authors:  F M Drudi; N Di Leo; F Maghella; F Malpassini; J Iera; A Rubini; N Orsogna; F D'Ambrosio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-08-03

3.  Feasibility of Retrograde Ureteral Contrast Injection to Guide Ultrasonographic Percutaneous Renal Access in the Nondilated Collecting System.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; David T Tzou; John Mongan; Kazumi Taguchi; Stefanie Weinstein; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  CEUS in the differentiation between low and high-grade bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  F M Drudi; N Di Leo; F Malpassini; F Antonini; E Corongiu; F Iori
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2012-09-24

5.  Quantitative evaluation of canine urinary bladder transitional cell carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Francesco Macrì; Simona Di Pietro; Cyndi Mangano; Michela Pugliese; Giuseppe Mazzullo; Nicola M Iannelli; Vito Angileri; Simona Morabito; Massimo De Majo
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in the urinary bladder: a case report.

Authors:  Wei Li; Ze-Zhen Su; Ji-Hui Kang; Xiao-Yan Xie; Xiao-Hua Xie; Bo-Wen Zhuang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Value of preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: A PRISMA compliant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaozhen Tong; Xiaofen Wu; Qiaohong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Bladder: Critical Features to Differentiate Occupied Lesions.

Authors:  Qiping Liu; Huiling Gong; Hui Zhu; Chunyan Yuan; Bin Hu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Differentiation between high- and low-grade urothelial carcinomas using contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Qiuyang Li; Jie Tang; Enhui He; Yanmi Li; Yun Zhou; Baojun Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.