PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the same kidney before and after transplantation to assess the ability of the allograft to restore blood flow, time required to achieve functional recovery after surgery and the possibility of differentiating normal from pathological allografts using color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) flow indices: resistive index (RI)/renal cortical ratio (RCR) and scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 living donors and 79 recipients. Donors underwent renal CDUS and scintigraphy. CDUS was repeated on the allograft 24 h, 3, 15 and 30 days after transplantation, and scintigraphy 3-5 days after transplantation. Recipients were divided into two groups on the basis of clinical and biochemical values: (A) well-functioning allografts and (B) acute pathology. Results of CDUS, RI and RCI were compared to results of scintigraphy, biochemical values and biopsy. RESULTS: Group (A) n = 60 (76 %), group (B) n = 19 (24 %); RI sensitivity was 93 %, specificity 83 %. In group (A) positive predictive value (PPV) was 94 % and in group (B) 90 %. RCR using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded sensitivity 100 % and specificity 98.3 %. Scintigraphy mean values of glomerular filtration ratio and T max before transplantation were in group (A): 50.32 ml/min and 4.87 min; after transplantation 46.88 ml/min and 4.96 min; in group (B): 48.68 ml/min and 4.63 min, after transplantation 27.89 ml/min and 10.53 min, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient between preoperative and postoperative results of scintigraphy was significant in group (A) (glomerular filtration ratio = 0.85, T max = 0.70) and not significant in group (B) (glomerular filtration ratio = 0.40, T max = 0.08). CONCLUSION: This study shows that CDUS, RI and RCR are useful in postoperative evaluation of transplanted kidneys as these parameters can, after only 24 h, confirm the good condition of the allograft despite still excessive blood parameter values.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the same kidney before and after transplantation to assess the ability of the allograft to restore blood flow, time required to achieve functional recovery after surgery and the possibility of differentiating normal from pathological allografts using color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) flow indices: resistive index (RI)/renal cortical ratio (RCR) and scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 living donors and 79 recipients. Donors underwent renal CDUS and scintigraphy. CDUS was repeated on the allograft 24 h, 3, 15 and 30 days after transplantation, and scintigraphy 3-5 days after transplantation. Recipients were divided into two groups on the basis of clinical and biochemical values: (A) well-functioning allografts and (B) acute pathology. Results of CDUS, RI and RCI were compared to results of scintigraphy, biochemical values and biopsy. RESULTS: Group (A) n = 60 (76 %), group (B) n = 19 (24 %); RI sensitivity was 93 %, specificity 83 %. In group (A) positive predictive value (PPV) was 94 % and in group (B) 90 %. RCR using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded sensitivity 100 % and specificity 98.3 %. Scintigraphy mean values of glomerular filtration ratio and T max before transplantation were in group (A): 50.32 ml/min and 4.87 min; after transplantation 46.88 ml/min and 4.96 min; in group (B): 48.68 ml/min and 4.63 min, after transplantation 27.89 ml/min and 10.53 min, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient between preoperative and postoperative results of scintigraphy was significant in group (A) (glomerular filtration ratio = 0.85, T max = 0.70) and not significant in group (B) (glomerular filtration ratio = 0.40, T max = 0.08). CONCLUSION: This study shows that CDUS, RI and RCR are useful in postoperative evaluation of transplanted kidneys as these parameters can, after only 24 h, confirm the good condition of the allograft despite still excessive blood parameter values.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood flow indices; Color Doppler; Living donor; Renal transplantation; Ultrasound
Authors: Jing Gao; Amelia Ng; George Shih; Michael Goldstein; Sandip Kapur; John Wang; Robert J Min Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: A Mehrsai; S Salem; H Ahmadi; N Baradaran; M Taherimahmoudi; M R Nikoobakht; M Rezaeidanesh; D Mansoori; G Pourmand Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: H T Khosroshahi; H K Heris; N Makhdami; A Habibzadeh; N Badrogli; R Oskoii; N Jahannavard Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: E Rodrigo; G López-Rasines; J C Ruiz; P Lastra; V Gómez-Dermitt; C Gómez-Alamillo; J González-Cotorruelo; A Calabia; M Arias Journal: Nephron Clin Pract Date: 2009-11-28
Authors: Francesco Maria Drudi; Vito Cantisani; Antonio Granata; Flavia Angelini; Daniela Messineo; Carlo De Felice; Evaristo Ettorre Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2019-06-13
Authors: Giorgia Comai; Olga Baraldi; Vania Cuna; Valeria Corradetti; Andrea Angeletti; Seidju Brunilda; Irene Capelli; Maria Cappuccilli; Gaetano LA Manna Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.155