Literature DB >> 20449566

Anal incontinence and bowel dysfunction after sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.

Catharina Forsgren1, Jan Zetterström, Anju Zhang, Anastasia Iliadou, Annika Lopez, Daniel Altman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of bowel dysfunction and anal incontinence in relation to vaginal vault prolapse surgery in women hysterectomized on benign indications.
METHODS: This is a case-control study where women having had sacrocolpopexy (n = 78) were compared with hysterectomized women without sacrocolpopexy (n = 233) using a bowel function questionnaire and the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS).
RESULTS: Sacrocolpopexy was performed on average 13.7 years (+/-11.1 SD) after the hysterectomy. Sacrocolpopexy was associated with an increased prevalence of rectal emptying difficulties (p = 0.04), incomplete rectal evacuation (p < 0.001), digitally assisted rectal emptying (p < 0.001), and use of enemas (p = 0.001). There was no overall significant difference in mean CCIS when comparing women having had vaginal vault prolapse surgery (CCIS = 2.78 +/- 4.1 SD) with those without (CCIS = 2.1 +/- 3.3 SD, p = 0.1)
CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is associated with obstructed defecation but not anal incontinence when compared to hysterectomized controls without vaginal vault prolapse surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20449566     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1167-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  18 in total

1.  Long-term results of abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Wesley S Hilger; Marilee Poulson; Peggy A Norton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Risk factors for female anal incontinence: new insight through the Evanston-Northwestern twin sisters study.

Authors:  Yoram Abramov; Peter K Sand; Sylvia M Botros; Sanjay Gandhi; Jay-James R Miller; Angel Nickolov; Roger P Goldberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Fecal incontinence in US women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Melville; Ming-Yu Fan; Katherine Newton; Dee Fenner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  The effect of vaginal dissection on the pudendal nerve.

Authors:  J T Benson; E McClellan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy.

Authors:  I Schultz; A Mellgren; A Dolk; C Johansson; B Holmström
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Fecal continence after rectocele repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  J H van Dam; W M Huisman; W C Hop; W R Schouten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Anorectal symptoms before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpoperineopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Marcos Ballester; Elisabeth Chereau; Charles Bui; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comment on Forsgren et al.: Anal incontinence and bowel dysfunction after sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Christl Reisenauer; Thomas Shiozawa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Sacrocolpopexy may cause difficult defecation by inhibiting the external opening out mechanism.

Authors:  Peter Petros; Michael Swash
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Bowel and bladder dysfunction following surgery within the presacral space: an overview of neuroanatomy, function, and dysfunction.

Authors:  Sarah A Huber; Gina M Northington; Deborah R Karp
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Short term outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse: case series.

Authors:  Fatma Ayça Gültekin
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-06-13

7.  Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Junwei Li; Yizhen Sima; Keqin Hua; Yisong Chen; Changdong Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Zhiying Lu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  J C Martín Del Olmo; M Toledano; M L Martín Esteban; M A Montenegro; J R Gómez; P Concejo; M Rodríguez de Castro; F Del Rio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.