Literature DB >> 14710081

Long-term results of abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Wesley S Hilger1, Marilee Poulson, Peggy A Norton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the long-term results after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. STUDY
DESIGN: Computer-coded procedure logs identified women who had an abdominal sacrocolpopexy performed from 1985 to 1992. Subjects answered a validated, condition-specific symptom questionnaire, a sexual function questionnaire, and a demographic survey. Failures were defined by reoperation or symptoms. The data were analyzed with use of the Student t test and the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: At the time of surgery the subjects (n=38) had a mean age of 59.2 years (range 40-77 years), parity 4.03 (1-9), BMI 26.5 (18.6-40.2), and stage of prolapse 2.56 (0-4). The mean follow-up interval was 13.7 years (10-17 years). The total number of failures was 10 (26.3%), 4 (10.5%) because of reoperation and 6 (16%) because of symptoms. Symptom distress scores were low and similar between failures and successes. Twelve subjects were available for examination and most defects were noted in the anterior wall.
CONCLUSION: This long-term outcome analysis of abdominal sacrocolpopexy found the procedure to be durable with a 74% success rate at a mean follow-up of 13.7 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14710081     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  15 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology.

Authors:  Adnan Orhan; Kemal Ozerkan; Hakan Vuruskan; Gokhan Ocakoglu; Isil Kasapoglu; Bahadir Koşan; Gurkan Uncu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Anal incontinence and bowel dysfunction after sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Catharina Forsgren; Jan Zetterström; Anju Zhang; Anastasia Iliadou; Annika Lopez; Daniel Altman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A novel technique for the management of advanced uterine/vault prolapse: extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Fikret Fatih Onol; Erdal Kaya; Osman Köse; Sinasi Yavuz Onol
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Unusual site of graft erosion after abdominal sacrocervicopexy.

Authors:  N V Nardello; R O Platte; M H Parekh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.

Authors:  R M Freeman; K Pantazis; A Thomson; J Frappell; L Bombieri; P Moran; M Slack; P Scott; M Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  New "Wrinkle Method" for Intracorporeal Anterior Vaginal Wall Plication during Sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Sa Ra Lee; Ju Hee Kim; Sung Hoon Kim; Hee Dong Chae
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  A long-term treatment outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Yeo Jung Moon; Hyun Joo Jung; Kyung Jin Lim; Hyo In Yang; Sei Kwang Kim; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Use of grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.