| Literature DB >> 20448793 |
Donghee Park1, Jinhee Yoon, Jingam Park, Byungjo Jung, Hyunjin Park, Jongbum Seo.
Abstract
Sonophoresis temporarily increases skin permeability such that medicine can be delivered transdermally. Cavitation is believed to be the predominant mechanism in sonophoresis. In this study, an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) strategy was adopted instead of low frequency ultrasound to assure that cavitation occurred, and the efficacy of sonophoresis with UCA was quantitatively analyzed by optical measurements. The target drug used in this study was 0.1 % Definity(R) in 70% glycerol, which was delivered into porcine skin samples. Glycerol was used because it is an optical clearing agent, and the efficiency of glycerol delivery could be analyzed with optical measurements. The applied acoustic pressure was approximately 600 kPa at 1 MHz ultrasound with a 10% duty cycle for 60 minutes. Experimental results indicated that the measured relative contrast (RC) after sonophoresis with UCA was approximately 80% higher than RC after sonophoresis without UCA. In addition, the variance of RC was also reduced by more than 50% with the addition of a UCA. The use of a UCA appeared to increase cavitation, demonstrating that the use of a UCA can be effective in transdermal drug delivery (TDD).Entities:
Keywords: Transdermal drug delivery; cavitation; non-invasive drug delivery; optical clearing agent.; sonophoresis; ultrasound contrast agent
Year: 2010 PMID: 20448793 PMCID: PMC2847207 DOI: 10.2174/1874120701004010056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Biomed Eng J ISSN: 1874-1207
Experimental Conditions
| Experiment No. | Experiment Condition | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Ex 1 | glycerol only | Control |
| Ex 2 | glycerol + UCA | Possible chemical cause |
| Ex 3 | glycerol + ultrasound (US) | Sonophoresis effect |
| Ex 4 | glycerol + microneedling (MN) + US | Air pocket + channel |
| Ex 5 | glycerol + UCA + US | Cavitation control cavitation |
| Ex 6 | glycerol + MN + UCA + US | Cavitation control + channel |
Average Relative Contrasts (Standard Deviation)
| After 0 min | After 20 min | After 40 min | After 60 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex 1 | 1 | 1.29(0.34) | 2.26(1.01) | 8.51(4.19) |
| Ex 2 | 1 | 1.63(0.58) | 4.36(2.50) | 7.78(3.16) |
| Ex 3 | 1 | 3.30(4.24) | 12.09(4.01) | 24.20(8.05) |
| Ex 4 | 1 | 3.81(1.97) | 10.94(4.22) | 22.13(7.45) |
| Ex 5 | 1 | 3.87(1.68) | 18.30(5.59) | 40.66(3.93) |
| Ex 6 | 1 | 4.12(2.58) | 16.87(4.72) | 31.05(5.14) |
Square Root of Average Relative Contrast (RC)
| After 0 min | After 20 min | After 40 min | After 60 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex 1 | 1 | 1.14 | 1.50 | 2.92 |
| Ex 2 | 1 | 1.28 | 2.50 | 2.79 |
| Ex 3 | 1 | 1.81 | 3.48 | 4.92 |
| Ex 4 | 1 | 1.95 | 3.31 | 4.70 |
| Ex 5 | 1 | 1.97 | 4.28 | 6.38 |
| Ex 6 | 1 | 2.03 | 4.11 | 5.57 |
RC of Duty Cycle 10% and 1% Insonification (Square Root of RC)
| After 0 min | After 20 min | After 40 min | After 60 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10%(Ex 5) | 1 | 3.87(1.97) | 18.30(4.28) | 40.66(6.38) |
| 1% | 1 | 2.95(1.72) | 13.86(3.72) | 30.35(5.50) |