Literature DB >> 20447871

One-year prognosis in sick-listed low back pain patients with and without radiculopathy. Prognostic factors influencing pain and disability.

Ole Kudsk Jensen1, Claus Vinther Nielsen, Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous research has documented various psychosocial risk factors with influence on outcome in low back pain (LBP) patients, but the value of clinical predictors has been less well documented.
PURPOSE: To identify clinical and psychosocial risk factors at baseline influencing disability and pain at 1 year in LBP patients sick-listed 3 to 16 weeks, and to look for differences between nonspecific LBP and radiculopathy. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study with 1-year follow-up based on a randomized clinical trial. OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability and change of disability, pain and change in pain at 1 year.
METHODS: In a randomized clinical study evaluating multidisciplinary versus brief intervention, 325 patients were followed for 1 year. At baseline, they completed a questionnaire and went through a clinical low back examination, including measure of forward flexion and side flexion as well as tender point examination, a method to estimate diffuse tenderness. Furthermore, degenerative changes on plain X-rays of the lumbar spine were quantified, and sciatica was investigated by magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS: Radiculopathy was verified by magnetic resonance imaging in 111 (34%) patients. At 1 year, questions of disability in daily life activities and pain were answered by 60% and 67%, respectively. The intensity of back+leg pain and disability was closely correlated. Statistically significant predictors for both disability and back+leg pain at 1 year were intensity of back+leg pain, worrying and health anxiety, many tender points, and little or moderate exercise in leisure time. Two additional risk factors were identified in patients with radiculopathy: older age and "drinking alcohol less than once per month." Furthermore, disability at 1 year was associated with initial disability and compensation claim, and back+leg pain at 1 year was associated with fear avoidance about physical activity and the duration of pain. Change in disability was more closely associated with return to work than change in pain. Disc degeneration was not associated with disability or pain at 1 year. General health was not statistically significantly associated with outcome when adjusted for back+leg pain, disability, and worrying and health anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: Disability and pain at 1 year were associated with baseline disability and pain, diffuse tenderness, worrying and health anxiety, compensation claim, fear avoidance, and baseline exercise habits. Only in patients with verified nerve root affection, older age, and restrained alcohol seemed to play a role. The multivariate models were insufficient in predicting disability and pain, partly because disability and pain were also strongly associated with return to work. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447871     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  19 in total

1.  Probiotics for chronic low back pain with type 1 Modic changes: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 1-year follow-up using Lactobacillus Rhamnosis GG.

Authors:  Ole K Jensen; Morten H Andersen; René D Østgård; Niels T Andersen; Nanna Rolving
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Conservative management of a 31 year old male with left sided low back and leg pain: a case report.

Authors:  Emily R Howell
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-09

3.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Chronic Spinal Pain Patients with Different Hopes (Treatment Goals) for Ongoing Chiropractic Care.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Sarah E Edgington; Gery W Ryan; Ian D Coulter
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.579

4.  [Measures of success in treatment of chronic back pain: pain intensity, disability and functional capacity: determinants of treatment success in multimodal day clinic setting].

Authors:  M Heinrich; K Hafenbrack; C Michel; D Monstadt; U Marnitz; R Klinger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Leisure-time physical activity and sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Shiri; K Falah-Hassani; E Viikari-Juntura; D Coggon
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  A literature review reveals that trials evaluating treatment of non-specific low back pain use inconsistent criteria to identify serious pathologies and nerve root involvement.

Authors:  Ciaran Williams; Mark J Hancock; Manuela Ferreira; Paulo Ferreira; Chris G Maher
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

7.  Visit Frequency and Outcomes for Patients Using Ongoing Chiropractic Care for Chronic Low-Back and Neck Pain: An Observational Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Sarah E Edgington; Melony E Sorbero; Eric L Hurwitz; Christine M Goertz; Ian D Coulter
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Validation of sick leave measures: self-reported sick leave and sickness benefit data from a Danish national register compared to multiple workplace-registered sick leave spells in a Danish municipality.

Authors:  Christina Malmose Stapelfeldt; Chris Jensen; Niels Trolle Andersen; Nils Fleten; Claus Vinther Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Prediction model for unsuccessful return to work after hospital-based intervention in low back pain patients.

Authors:  Ole Kudsk Jensen; Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen; Chris Jensen; Claus Vinther Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Reproducibility of tender point examination in chronic low back pain patients as measured by intrarater and inter-rater reliability and agreement: a validation study.

Authors:  Ole Kudsk Jensen; Jacob Callesen; Merete Graakjaer Nielsen; Torkell Ellingsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.