Literature DB >> 20447790

View-sharing in keyhole imaging: Partially compressed central k-space acquisition in time-resolved MRA at 3.0 T.

Dariusch R Hadizadeh1, Jürgen Gieseke, Gabriele Beck, Liesbeth Geerts, Guido M Kukuk, Azize Boström, Horst Urbach, Hans H Schild, Winfried A Willinek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography (CEMRA) of the intracranial vasculature has proved its clinical value for the evaluation of cerebral vascular disease in cases where both flow hemodynamics and morphology are important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a combination of view-sharing with keyhole imaging to increase spatial and temporal resolution of time-resolved CEMRA at 3.0 T.
METHODS: Alternating view-sharing was combined with randomly segmented k-space ordering, keyhole imaging, partial Fourier and parallel imaging (4DkvsMRA). 4DkvsMRA was evaluated using varying compression factors (80-100) resulting in spatial resolutions ranging from (1.1×1.1×1.4) to (0.96×0.96×0.95) mm3 and temporal resolutions ranging from 586 ms/dynamic scan--288 ms/dynamic scan in three protocols in 10 healthy volunteers and seven patients (17 subjects). DSA correlation was available in four patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (cAVMs) and one patient with cerebral teleangiectasia.
RESULTS: 4DkvsMRA was successfully performed in all subjects and showed clear depiction of arterial and venous phases with diagnostic image quality. At the maximum view-sharing compression factor (=100), a "flickering" artefact was observed.
CONCLUSION: View-sharing in keyhole imaging allows for increased spatial and temporal resolution in time-resolved MRA.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447790     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

1.  Noninvasive evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations by 4D-MRA for preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in 56 patients: comparison with DSA and intraoperative findings.

Authors:  D R Hadizadeh; G M Kukuk; D T Steck; J Gieseke; H Urbach; H J Tschampa; S Greschus; A Kovàcs; M Möhlenbruch; A Bostroem; H H Schild; W A Willinek
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Reduced k-space acquisition to accelerate MR imaging of moving interventional instruments: a phantom study.

Authors:  Jens Christian Rump; Martin Jonczyk; Christian Jürgen Seebauer; Florian Streitparth; Felix Victor Güttler; Ulf Karl-Martin Teichgräber; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Xiaoqi Wang; Peng Wu; Yajie Wang; Weibo Chen; Huijun Chen; Jianqi Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-11

4.  Artifacts during the arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Multiple arterial phases using view-sharing from two different vendors versus single arterial phase imaging.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Young Kon Kim; Tae Wook Kang; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Won Jae Lee; Soohyun Ahn; Na Young Hwang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  [Fast MRI sequences for clarification of acute neurological symptoms].

Authors:  K J Wenger; E Hattingen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Triple Arterial Phase MR Imaging with Gadoxetic Acid Using a Combination of Contrast Enhanced Time Robust Angiography, Keyhole, and Viewsharing Techniques and Two-Dimensional Parallel Imaging in Comparison with Conventional Single Arterial Phase.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Eun Ju Kim; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  The Impact of Injector-Based Contrast Agent Administration on Bolus Shape and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Image Quality.

Authors:  Gregor Jost; Jan Endrikat; Hubertus Pietsch
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2017-04-20

8.  Magnetic resonance angiography using fresh blood imaging in oral and maxillofacial regions.

Authors:  Masafumi Oda; Tatsurou Tanaka; Shinji Kito; Manabu Habu; Masaaki Kodama; Shinya Kokuryo; Ikuya Miyamoto; Daigo Yoshiga; Kensuke Yamauchi; Shinnosuke Nogami; Nao Wakasugi-Sato; Shinobu Matsumoto-Takeda; Ayataka Ishikawa; Ikuko Nishida; Katsura Saeki; Kazumasa Morikawa; Kou Matsuo; Yuji Seta; Yoshihiro Yamashita; Kenshi Maki; Kazuhiro Tominaga; Yasuhiro Morimoto
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-10-17

9.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Diagnosis of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation and Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Comparison of Time-Resolved Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Three Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Authors:  Yu-Ching Cheng; Hung-Chieh Chen; Chen-Hao Wu; Yi-Ying Wu; Ming-His Sun; Wen-Hsien Chen; Jyh-Wen Chai; Clayton Chi-Chang Chen
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 0.212

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.