Literature DB >> 20445964

Importance of bone mineral density measurements in evaluating fragility bone fracture risk in Asian Indian men.

K Kuruvilla1, A M Kenny, L G Raisz, J E Kerstetter, R S Feinn, T V Rajan.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effect of BMD on fracture risk prediction using FRAX® among Asian Indian men when used in conjunction with clinical risk factors. A majority of our subjects were either osteopenic or osteoporotic, and their fracture risk increased when FRAX® was used in conjunction with femur neck T-scores.
INTRODUCTION: Asian Indian men living in the United States may represent a population that is at high and underappreciated risk for fragility bone fractures.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of BMD on fracture risk prediction using FRAX® among Asian Indian men when used in conjunction with clinical risk factors.
METHODS: Forty four Asian Indian men (mean age 64.9 (±8.4) years) who had lived in the United States for an average of 33.6 (±10.6) years underwent BMD measurement at the proximal femur. Subjects were subjected to a general physical exam and history of fracture, hip fracture in a parent, current smoking and alcohol use, and diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis was obtained. Data from each subject were entered into the FRAX® algorithm and 10-year fracture probabilities were calculated using clinical risk factors (CRFs) alone and in combination with femur neck T-scores.
RESULTS: Thirteen subjects (29.5%) had femur neck T-scores ≥ -1.0, 28 (63.6%) T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5, and three (6.8%) T-scores < -2.5. The 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture based on a combination of clinical risk factors and femur neck T-scores was significantly higher than the fracture probability based on clinical risk factors alone (t(43) = 2.58, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Among Asian Indian men, the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture increases when femur neck T-scores are added to clinical risk factors in the FRAX® algorithm, and this population have a high fracture probability even in the absence of clinical risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20445964     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1237-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  16 in total

1.  Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Variation in lumbar spine bone mineral content by age and gender in apparently healthy Indians.

Authors:  Nidhi Kadam; Anuradha Khadilkar; Shashi Chiplonkar; Vaman Khadilkar; Zulf Mughal
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  FRAX and its applications to clinical practice.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Fredrik Borgström; Oskar Ström; Eugene McCloskey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention.

Authors:  H Johansson; J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Human genetics: Tracing India's invisible threads.

Authors:  Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Adherence of academic geriatric practitioners to osteoporosis screening guidelines.

Authors:  D N McNally; A M Kenny; J-A Smith
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England.

Authors:  D H Solomon; M T Connelly; C J Rosen; B Dawson-Hughes; D P Kiel; S L Greenspan; E S Leib; M Holick; A H Miguel; J S Finkelstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  7 in total

1.  FRAX calculated without BMD does not correctly identify Caucasian men with densitometric evidence of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R C Hamdy; E Seier; K Whalen; W A Clark; K Hicks; T B Piggee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effect of Androgen-deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Miyazawa; Yoshitaka Sekine; Takahiro Syuto; Masashi Nomura; Hidekazu Koike; Hiroshi Matsui; Yasuhiro Shibata; Kazuto Ito; Kazuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  FRAX First - Pragmatic Approach in Resource Poor Settings.

Authors:  Adlyne Reena Asirvatham; Karthik Balachandran; Subramanian Kannan; Satish K Balasubramaniam; Shriraam Mahadevan
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

4.  FRAX Calculated without BMD Resulting in a Higher Fracture Risk Than That Calculated with BMD in Women with Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rizky Suganda Prawiradilaga; Victoria Gunmalm; Trine Lund-Jacobsen; Eva Wulff Helge; Charlotte Brøns; Michael Andersson; Peter Schwarz
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2018-10-04

5.  Predictors of Bone Mineral Density among Asian Indians in Northern Mississippi: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Vinayak K Nahar; Kyle M Nelson; M Allison Ford; Manoj Sharma; Martha A Bass; Mary A Haskins; John C Garner
Journal:  J Res Health Sci       Date:  2016

6.  A study to predict fracture risk using bone mineral density and FRAX score in patients on chronic maintenance haemodialysis.

Authors:  Sunil K Patro; Neeraj Pawar; Diwashish Biswas
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-01-31

7.  Bone management in Japanese patients with prostate cancer: hormonal therapy leads to an increase in the FRAX score.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Shusei Fusayasu; Koji Izumi; Yumiko Yokomizo; Hiroki Ito; Yusuke Ito; Kayo Kurita; Kazuhiro Furuya; Hisashi Hasumi; Narihiko Hayashi; Yasuhide Myoshi; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Masahiro Yao; Hiroji Uemura
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.