Literature DB >> 2044545

Coronary reserve in patients with aortic valve disease before and after successful aortic valve replacement.

F R Eberli1, M Ritter, J Schwitter, A Bortone, J Schneider, O M Hess, H P Krayenbuehl.   

Abstract

In patients with aortic valve disease and normal coronary angiograms coronary reserve was determined by the coronary sinus thermodilution technique. Three groups of patients were studied: 37 preoperative patients; 18 different patients 12-52 months after aortic valve replacement and seven control subjects with no cardiac disease. Coronary flow ratio (dipyridamole/rest) was diminished in preoperative compared with postoperative patients (1.66 +/- 0.44 vs 2.22 +/- 0.85; P less than 0.05) as well as with controls (2.80 +/- 0.84; P less than 0.01), and corresponding coronary resistance ratio (dipyridamole/rest) was higher in preoperative patients than in both other groups (0.61 +/- 0.17 vs 0.48 +/- 0.14; P less than 0.05 vs 0.37 +/- 0.10; P less than 0.01). Differences in the flow ratio, but not in the resistance ratio, were significant (P less than 0.05) in patients after aortic valve replacement compared with controls. Total coronary sinus blood flow at rest was elevated in preoperative compared with both postoperative patients and controls (252 +/- 99 vs 169 +/- 63; P less than 0.01; vs 170 +/- 35 ml.min-1, P less than 0.05), whereas flows after maximal vasodilation did not differ among the three groups (416 +/- 184 vs 361 +/- 150 vs 488 +/- 235 ml.min-1). Postoperative patients showed a distinct, though not total regression of left ventricular angiographic muscle mass index and wall thickness. Nine of the 18 postoperative patients showed a normal coronary flow reserve and nine showed subnormal response. These two subgroups did not differ with respect to preoperative macroscopic and microscopic measures of hypertrophy. Thus in aortic valve disease, the reduced coronary vasodilator capacity is mainly due to an elevated coronary flow at rest, while the maximal coronary blood flow achieved is identical to that of postoperative patients and controls. With regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, flow at rest decreases and this leads to a distinct improvement of coronary flow reserve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2044545     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  11 in total

Review 1.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy; what are appropriate therapeutic objectives?

Authors:  D J Sheridan; M P Kingsbury; N A Flores
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Myocardial perfusion and coronary microcirculation: from pathophysiology to clinical application.

Authors:  Antonio L'Abbate; Gianmario Sambuceti; Danilo Neglia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Doppler estimation of reduced coronary flow reserve in mice with pressure overload cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Craig J Hartley; Anilkumar K Reddy; Sridhar Madala; Lloyd H Michael; Mark L Entman; George E Taffet
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Aortic stenosis and angina with normal coronary arteries: the role of coronary flow abnormalities.

Authors:  T Irvine; A Kenny
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  The Influence of Aortic Valve Obstruction on the Hyperemic Intracoronary Physiology: Difference Between Resting Pd/Pa and FFR in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Roberto Scarsini; Giovanni L De Maria; Giuseppe Di Gioia; Rafail A Kotronias; Cristina Aurigemma; Giuseppe Zimbardo; Francesco Burzotta; Antonio M Leone; Gabriele Pesarini; Carlo Trani; Filippo Crea; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Bernard De Bruyne; Emanuele Barbato; Adrian Banning; Flavio Ribichini
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Is the coronary flow velocity reserve improvement after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis transient? Results of a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Tamás Forster; Zsolt Kovács; Miklós Csanády
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Adenosine stress native T1 mapping in severe aortic stenosis: evidence for a role of the intravascular compartment on myocardial T1 values.

Authors:  Masliza Mahmod; Stefan K Piechnik; Eylem Levelt; Vanessa M Ferreira; Jane M Francis; Andrew Lewis; Nikhil Pal; Sairia Dass; Houman Ashrafian; Stefan Neubauer; Theodoros D Karamitsos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality.

Authors:  Joerg Herrmann; Juan Carlos Kaski; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  The comparative value of the aortic atherosclerosis and the coronary flow velocity reserve evaluated by stress transesophageal echocardiography in the prediction of patients with aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Tamás Forster; Attila Thury; Zsolt Kovács; Krisztina Boda; Miklós Csanády
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Challenges in Diagnosis and Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Srdjan Aleksandric; Marko Banovic; Branko Beleslin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.