Literature DB >> 20445137

Computed tomography shielding methods: a literature review.

Jessica Ryann Curtis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate available shielding methods in an effort to further awareness and understanding of existing preventive measures related to patient exposure in computed tomography (CT) scanning.
METHODS: Searches were conducted to locate literature discussing the effectiveness of commercially available shields. Literature containing information regarding breast, gonad, eye and thyroid shielding was identified. Because of rapidly advancing technology, the selection of articles was limited to those published within the past 5 years. The selected studies were examined using the following topics as guidelines: the effectiveness of the shield (percentage of dose reduction), the shield's effect on image quality, arguments for or against its use (including practicality) and overall recommendation for its use in clinical practice.
RESULTS: Only a limited number of studies have been performed on the use of shields for the eyes, thyroid and gonads, but the evidence shows an overall benefit to their use. Breast shielding has been the most studied shielding method, with consistent agreement throughout the literature on its effectiveness at reducing radiation dose. The effect of shielding on image quality was not remarkable in a majority of studies. Although it is noted that more studies need to be conducted regarding the impact on image quality, the currently published literature stresses the importance of shielding in reducing dose.
CONCLUSION: Commercially available shields for the breast, thyroid, eyes and gonads should be implemented in clinical practice. Further research is needed to ascertain the prevalence of shielding in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20445137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Technol        ISSN: 0033-8397


  7 in total

1.  Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening.

Authors:  Hongxiang Mu; Jing Sun; Linwei Li; Jie Yin; Nan Hu; Weichao Zhao; Dexin Ding; Lan Yi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Tube-Voltage Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT: Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Image Quality.

Authors:  J-E Scholtz; M Kaup; K Hüsers; M H Albrecht; B Bodelle; S C Metzger; J M Kerl; R W Bauer; T Lehnert; T J Vogl; J L Wichmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Dose reduction efforts for pediatric head CT imaging in Washington State trauma centers: follow-up survey results.

Authors:  Janessa M Graves; Kalpana M Kanal; Frederick P Rivara; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads?

Authors:  Matthew Winfeld; Naomi Strubel; Lynne Pinkney; Shailee Lala; Sarah Milla; James Babb; Nancy Fefferman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02

5.  Pediatric minor head injury imaging practices: results from an ESPR survey.

Authors:  Maria I Argyropoulou; George A Alexiou; Vassileios G Xydis; Catherine Adamsbaum; Jean-Francois Chateil; Andrea Rossi; Nadine Girard; Élida Vázquez; Loukas G Astrakas
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Generation of the additional fluorescence radiation in the elastomeric shields used in computer tomography (CT).

Authors:  P Szajerski; M Zaborski; H Bem; W Baryn; E Kusiak
Journal:  J Radioanal Nucl Chem       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 1.371

Review 7.  Optimized imaging of the midface and orbits.

Authors:  Sönke Langner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.