Literature DB >> 20445034

Response competition in the primary motor cortex: corticospinal excitability reflects response replacement during simple decisions.

Thomas Michelet1, Gary H Duncan, Paul Cisek.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that, during decisions about actions, multiple options are initially specified in parallel and then gradually eliminated in a competition for overt execution. To further test this hypothesis, we studied the modulation of human corticospinal excitability during the reaction time of the Eriksen flanker task. In the task, subjects responded with finger flexion or extension to a central arrow while ignoring congruent or incongruent flanker arrows. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over primary motor cortex (M1) at one of five different latencies after stimulus onset, and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured in the contralateral index finger. During the control (no flankers) and congruent conditions, MEP size in the agonist increased gradually over the course of reaction time, indicating an increase in corticospinal excitability. Conversely, when the same muscle acted as an antagonist, MEP size decreased, suggesting inhibition. Critically, in the incongruent condition, MEPs briefly increased in the muscle corresponding to an initial default response to the flanker arrows and were later replaced by MEPs corresponding to the correct response to the central arrow. Finally, we found that the gradually growing MEPs for the three conditions reached a constant maximum level just before movement initiation. We propose that this dynamic modulation in corticospinal excitability reflects the competition process, leading to the selection of one response and the rejection of the other. Our results suggest that response competition influences activity in primary motor cortex and that its timing directly influences motor output latency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20445034     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00819.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  33 in total

1.  Temporal dynamics of motor cortex excitability during perception of natural emotional scenes.

Authors:  Sara Borgomaneri; Valeria Gazzola; Alessio Avenanti
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Speech dynamics are coded in the left motor cortex in fluent speakers but not in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nicole E Neef; T N Linh Hoang; Andreas Neef; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Dorsal premotor cortex: neural correlates of reach target decisions based on a color-location matching rule and conflicting sensory evidence.

Authors:  Émilie Coallier; Thomas Michelet; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor cortex disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; David Thura; Paul Cisek; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Unilateral movement preparation causes task-specific modulation of TMS responses in the passive, opposite limb.

Authors:  Lilian Chye; Stephan Riek; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.

Authors:  Gerard Derosiere; Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Sylvie Nozaradan; Alexandre Zénon; André Mouraux; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Influence of reward on corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Etienne Olivier; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Changes in corticospinal excitability during reach adaptation in force fields.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Michelle D Harran; Yousef Salimpour; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Is cognitive control automatic? New insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  G Cona; B Treccani; C A Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

10.  Deliberation in the motor system: reflex gains track evolving evidence leading to a decision.

Authors:  Luc P J Selen; Michael N Shadlen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.