BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) disease has a major impact on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however, the relative contributions of traditional CV risk factors and markers of RA severity are unclear. The authors examined the relative importance of traditional CV risk factors and RA markers in predicting CV events. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted in the setting of the CORRONA registry in the USA. Baseline data from subjects with RA enrolled in the CORRONA registry were examined to determine predictors of CV outcomes, including myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack. Possible predictors were of two types: traditional CV risk factors and markers of RA severity. The discriminatory value of these variables was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c-statistic) in logistic regression. The authors then assessed the incidence rate for CV events among subjects with an increasing number of traditional CV risk factors and/or RA severity markers. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 10 156 patients with RA followed for a median of 22 months. The authors observed 76 primary CV events during follow-up for a composite event rate of 3.98 (95% CI 3.08 to 4.88) per 1000 patient-years. The c-statistic improved from 0.57 for models with only CV risk factors to 0.67 for models with CV risk factors plus age and gender. The c-statistic improved further to 0.71 when markers of RA severity were also added. The incidence rate for CV events was 0 (95% CI 0 to 5.98) for persons without any CV risk factors or markers of RA severity, while in the group with two or more CV risk factors and three or more markers of RA severity the incidence was 7.47 (95% CI 4.21 to 10.73) per 1000 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional CV risk factors and markers of RA severity both contribute to models predicting CV events. Increasing numbers of both types of factors are associated with greater risk.
BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular (CV) disease has a major impact on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however, the relative contributions of traditional CV risk factors and markers of RA severity are unclear. The authors examined the relative importance of traditional CV risk factors and RA markers in predicting CV events. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted in the setting of the CORRONA registry in the USA. Baseline data from subjects with RA enrolled in the CORRONA registry were examined to determine predictors of CV outcomes, including myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack. Possible predictors were of two types: traditional CV risk factors and markers of RA severity. The discriminatory value of these variables was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c-statistic) in logistic regression. The authors then assessed the incidence rate for CV events among subjects with an increasing number of traditional CV risk factors and/or RA severity markers. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 10 156 patients with RA followed for a median of 22 months. The authors observed 76 primary CV events during follow-up for a composite event rate of 3.98 (95% CI 3.08 to 4.88) per 1000 patient-years. The c-statistic improved from 0.57 for models with only CV risk factors to 0.67 for models with CV risk factors plus age and gender. The c-statistic improved further to 0.71 when markers of RA severity were also added. The incidence rate for CV events was 0 (95% CI 0 to 5.98) for persons without any CV risk factors or markers of RA severity, while in the group with two or more CV risk factors and three or more markers of RA severity the incidence was 7.47 (95% CI 4.21 to 10.73) per 1000 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional CV risk factors and markers of RA severity both contribute to models predicting CV events. Increasing numbers of both types of factors are associated with greater risk.
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Elizabeth W Karlson; Eric B Rimm; Carolyn C Cannuscio; Lisa A Mandl; JoAnn E Manson; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-03-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Inmaculada Del Rincón; Ken Williams; Michael P Stern; Gregory L Freeman; Daniel H O'Leary; Agustín Escalante Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2003-07
Authors: David W McCarey; Iain B McInnes; Rajan Madhok; Rosie Hampson; Olga Scherbakov; Ian Ford; Hilary A Capell; Naveed Sattar Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-06-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C T Sempos; J I Cleeman; M D Carroll; C L Johnson; P S Bachorik; D J Gordon; V L Burt; R R Briefel; C D Brown; K Lippel Journal: JAMA Date: 1993-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Aikaterini Arida; Evi Zampeli; George Konstantonis; Kalliope Fragiadaki; George D Kitas; Athanasios D Protogerou; Petros P Sfikakis Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Christie M Bartels; Heather Johnson; Katya Voelker; Carolyn Thorpe; Patrick McBride; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Nancy Pandhi; Maureen Smith Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Katherine P Liao; Dorothée Diogo; Jing Cui; Tianxi Cai; Yukinori Okada; Vivian S Gainer; Shawn N Murphy; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Mirel; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Peter Szolovits; Stanley Y Shaw; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane; Elizabeth W Karlson; Robert M Plenge Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Bing Lu; Young Hee Rho; Jing Cui; Christine K Iannaccone; Michelle L Frits; Elizabeth W Karlson; Nancy A Shadick Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 4.666