OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of lipid testing in clinical practice and to explore the relationship between rheumatoid arthritis (RA), dyslipidemia, and other cardiovascular (CV) risk factors with RA treatment. METHODS: Patients in this retrospective database study were ages ≥18 years and had ≥2 physician diagnoses for RA or osteoarthritis (OA; comparator group) between March 2004 and March 2008. Outcomes of interest included the percentage of RA and OA patients receiving lipid tests, lipid profiles (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol) of RA versus OA patients, and lipid profiles of RA patients before and after initiation with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. We used multivariable regression to control potential confounders between the cohorts. RESULTS: Over a median ≥2-year followup, fewer RA patients than OA patients had ≥1 lipid test (62.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 61.5-62.5] versus 69.8% [95% CI 69.5-70.1]). Mean total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were each 4 mg/dl lower in the RA cohort (P < 0.0001); HDL cholesterol was similar between the cohorts. Across the RA cohort, 25.2% of patients had suboptimal LDL cholesterol levels (≥130 mg/dl). Among RA patients not receiving lipid-lowering therapy who initiated TNF inhibitor therapy (n = 96), mean total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol increased by 5.4 and 4.0 mg/dl, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA were less likely to be tested for hyperlipidemia and had more favorable lipid profiles than patients with OA. TNF inhibitor therapy modestly increased all lipid parameters. Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of traditional CV risk factors and inflammation and the impact of biologic agents on CV outcomes in RA patients.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of lipid testing in clinical practice and to explore the relationship between rheumatoid arthritis (RA), dyslipidemia, and other cardiovascular (CV) risk factors with RA treatment. METHODS:Patients in this retrospective database study were ages ≥18 years and had ≥2 physician diagnoses for RA or osteoarthritis (OA; comparator group) between March 2004 and March 2008. Outcomes of interest included the percentage of RA and OA patients receiving lipid tests, lipid profiles (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol) of RA versus OA patients, and lipid profiles of RApatients before and after initiation with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. We used multivariable regression to control potential confounders between the cohorts. RESULTS: Over a median ≥2-year followup, fewer RApatients than OA patients had ≥1 lipid test (62.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 61.5-62.5] versus 69.8% [95% CI 69.5-70.1]). Mean total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were each 4 mg/dl lower in the RA cohort (P < 0.0001); HDL cholesterol was similar between the cohorts. Across the RA cohort, 25.2% of patients had suboptimal LDL cholesterol levels (≥130 mg/dl). Among RApatients not receiving lipid-lowering therapy who initiated TNF inhibitor therapy (n = 96), mean total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol increased by 5.4 and 4.0 mg/dl, respectively. CONCLUSION:Patients with RA were less likely to be tested for hyperlipidemia and had more favorable lipid profiles than patients with OA. TNF inhibitor therapy modestly increased all lipid parameters. Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of traditional CV risk factors and inflammation and the impact of biologic agents on CV outcomes in RApatients.
Authors: M J L Peters; D P M Symmons; D McCarey; B A C Dijkmans; P Nicola; T K Kvien; I B McInnes; H Haentzschel; M A Gonzalez-Gay; S Provan; A Semb; P Sidiropoulos; G Kitas; Y M Smulders; M Soubrier; Z Szekanecz; N Sattar; M T Nurmohamed Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Eduardo Nicolas Pollono; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Juan Antonio Martinez Lopez; Maria E Suarez-Almazor Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2010-04-10 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Paulo J Nicola; Hilal Maradit-Kremers; Véronique L Roger; Steven J Jacobsen; Cynthia S Crowson; Karla V Ballman; Sherine E Gabriel Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2005-02
Authors: C A Wijbrandts; S I van Leuven; H D Boom; D M Gerlag; E G S Stroes; J J P Kastelein; P P Tak Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Iris Navarro-Millán; Christina Charles-Schoeman; Shuo Yang; Joan M Bathon; S Louis Bridges; Lang Chen; Stacey S Cofield; Louis J Dell'Italia; Larry W Moreland; James R O'Dell; Harold E Paulus; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2013-06
Authors: Rishi J Desai; Wesley Eddings; Katherine P Liao; Daniel H Solomon; Seoyoung C Kim Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Ty M Thomson; Reynald M Lescarbeau; David A Drubin; Daphna Laifenfeld; David de Graaf; David A Fryburg; Bruce Littman; Renée Deehan; Aaron Van Hooser Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Ernest Choy; Kandeepan Ganeshalingam; Anne Grete Semb; Zoltán Szekanecz; Michael Nurmohamed Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Christina Charles-Schoeman; Roy Fleischmann; Jean Davignon; Howard Schwartz; Scott M Turner; Carine Beysen; Mark Milad; Marc K Hellerstein; Zhen Luo; Irina V Kaplan; Richard Riese; Andrea Zuckerman; Iain B McInnes Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 10.995