Literature DB >> 20444666

Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.

Patricia Carrascosa1, Carlos Capuñay, Alejandro Deviggiano, Alejandro Goldsmit, Carlos Tajer, Marcelo Bettinotti, Jorge Carrascosa, Thomas B Ivanc, Arzhang Fallahi, Mario J García.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Desirable methods for cardiac CT angiography would both reduce radiation exposure from cardiac CT angiography and preserve accuracy.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of a low-dose, prospectively gated axial cardiac CT angiography protocol for the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients referred for diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and with a stable heart rate < 60 beats/min after beta-blocker administration were prospectively enrolled in a single center study. Subjects underwent CT angiography with a 64-row multidetector CT scanner with a prospectively gated axial imaging protocol. If the examination was determined to be nondiagnostic, then a retrospectively gated helical scan was performed. Two reviewers independently assessed image quality and the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis (>50%).
RESULTS: Prospectively gated CT angiography was successfully performed in 46 of 50 patients. Of 794 coronary segments, 777 were determined to be of diagnostic image quality. The overall patient-based sensitivity (95% CI), specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenosis were 100% (87%-100%), 75% (53%-90%), 81% (64%-93%), 100% (81%-100%), and 88% (81%-95%), respectively. The mean effective radiation dose for CT angiography and ICA were 3.4 +/- 0.4 mSv and 6.9 +/- 0.8 mSv, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac CT angiography performed in a prospectively gated axial mode with 64-row multidetector CT provides an accurate, low-dose alternative for the detection of CAD. Copyright 2010 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20444666     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  12 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies on non-invasive coronary CT angiography: influence of QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews) items on sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  Sabine Schueler; Stefan Walther; Georg M Schuetz; Peter Schlattmann; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating based on step-and-shoot, Flash and volume modes for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Linfeng Yang; Tao Zhou; Ruijie Zhang; Lin Xu; Zhaohui Peng; Juan Ding; Sen Wang; Min Li; Gang Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Value of segmental coronary calcium score on diagnosis and interventional treatment of coronary lesions by 320-slice DVCT.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Li; Guo-Ming Zhang; Hong-Ming Zhang; Gang Sun; Shu-Fang Han; Hong Tan; Yu-Qi Gao; Qun Jin; Yan-Min Li; Jie Fang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yang Hou; Yue Ma; Weipeng Fan; Yuke Wang; Mei Yu; Mani Vembar; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Evaluation of dual energy computed tomography iodine mapping within the myocardial blood pool for detection of acute myocardial infarction: correlation with histopathological findings in a porcine model.

Authors:  Kai Sun; Ruijuan Han; Ruiping Zhao; Shuancheng Bai; Junyan Wang; Jiang Hu; Bin Lu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Using coronary CT angiography for guiding invasive coronary angiography: potential role to reduce intraprocedural radiation exposure.

Authors:  Christophe T Arendt; Patricia Tischendorf; Julian L Wichmann; Michael Messerli; Lucas Jörg; Niklas Ehl; Robin F Gohmann; Simon Wildermuth; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Use of 3x2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies.

Authors:  Georg M Schuetz; Peter Schlattmann; Marc Dewey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-10-24

9.  Prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rates: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated spiral acquisition mode.

Authors:  Kai Sun; Rui-Juan Han; Li-Jun Ma; Li-Jun Wang; Li-Gang Li; Jiu-Hong Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Diagnostic performance of 64-row coronary CT angiography in detecting significant stenosis as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Amirreza Sajjadieh; Ali Hekmatnia; Maryam Keivani; Abdollah Asoodeh; Masoud Pourmoghaddas; Hamid Sanei
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.