Literature DB >> 20444116

Inattentional blindness with the same scene at different scales.

Henry L Apfelbaum1, Christina Gambacorta, Russell L Woods, Eli Peli.   

Abstract

People with severely restricted peripheral visual fields have difficulty walking confidently and safely in the physical environment. Augmented vision devices that we are developing for low-vision rehabilitation implement vision multiplexing, providing two views of the same scene at two different scales (sizes), with a cartooned minified wide view overlaying a natural see-through view. Inattentional blindness may partially limit the utility of these devices as low-vision aids. Inattentional blindness, the apparent inability to notice significant but unexpected events in an unattended scene when attention is fixed on another scene, has classically been demonstrated by overlaying two unrelated game scenes, with unexpected events occurring in one scene while attention is maintained on the other scene by a distractor task. We hypothesized that context like that provided by the related wide view in our devices might mitigate inattentional blindness in a study with two simultaneous views of the same scene shown at different scales. It did not, and unexpected event detection rates were remarkably consistent with our and other mixed-scene studies. Still, detecting about half of the unexpected events bodes well for our use of vision aids that employ vision multiplexing. Without the aids, is it likely that many more events would be missed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20444116      PMCID: PMC2867068          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00702.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  Vision multiplexing: an engineering approach to vision rehabilitation device development.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The effects of eye movements, spatial attention, and stimulus features on inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Mika Koivisto; Jukka Hyönä; Antti Revonsuo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Control of attention and gaze in complex environments.

Authors:  Jelena Jovancevic; Brian Sullivan; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Use of an augmented-vision device for visual search by patients with tunnel vision.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Differential effects of shared attention on perception of heading and 3-D object motion.

Authors:  C S Royden; E C Hildreth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-01

7.  Collision judgment when using an augmented-vision head-mounted display device.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Inattentional blindness and augmented-vision displays: effects of cartoon-like filtering and attended scene.

Authors:  Henry L Apfelbaum; Doris H Apfelbaum; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Applications of Augmented Vision Head-Mounted Systems in Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Eli Peli; Gang Luo; Alex Bowers; Noa Rensing
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.140

10.  Adaptive gaze control in natural environments.

Authors:  Jelena Jovancevic-Misic; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  I Thought I Saw "Zorro": An Inattentional Blindness Study.

Authors:  Bahadır Oktay; Banu Cangöz
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.