Literature DB >> 10070204

Differential effects of shared attention on perception of heading and 3-D object motion.

C S Royden1, E C Hildreth.   

Abstract

When a person moves in a straight line through a stationary environment, the images of object surfaces move in a radial pattern away from a single point. This point, known as the focus of expansion (FOE), corresponds to the person's direction of motion. People judge their heading from image motion quite well in this situation. They perform most accurately when they can see the region around the FOE, which contains the most useful information for this task. Furthermore, a large moving object in the scene has no effect on observer heading judgments unless it obscures the FOE. Therefore, observers may obtain the most accurate heading judgments by focusing their attention on the region around the FOE. However, in many situations (e.g., driving), the observer must pay attention to other moving objects in the scene (e.g., cars and pedestrians) to avoid collisions. These objects may be located far from the FOE in the visual field. We tested whether people can accurately judge their heading and the three-dimensional (3-D) motion of objects while paying attention to one or the other task. The results show that differential allocation of attention affects people's ability to judge 3-D object motion much more than it affects their ability to judge heading. This suggests that heading judgments are computed globally, whereas judgments about object motion may require more focused attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10070204     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Approaching objects cause confusion in patients with Alzheimer's disease regarding their direction of self-movement.

Authors:  Mark Mapstone; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Receptive field dynamics underlying MST neuronal optic flow selectivity.

Authors:  Chen Ping Yu; William K Page; Roger Gaborski; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Inattentional blindness with the same scene at different scales.

Authors:  Henry L Apfelbaum; Christina Gambacorta; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Dissociation of Self-Motion and Object Motion by Linear Population Decoding That Approximates Marginalization.

Authors:  Ryo Sasaki; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Human brain regions involved in heading estimation.

Authors:  H Peuskens; S Sunaert; P Dupont; P Van Hecke; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Multisensory Integration of Visual and Vestibular Signals Improves Heading Discrimination in the Presence of a Moving Object.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Perceived shift of the centres of contracting and expanding optic flow fields: Different biases in the lower-right and upper-right visual quadrants.

Authors:  Xiaorong Cheng; Chunmiao Lou; Xianfeng Ding; Wei Liu; Xueling Zhang; Zhao Fan; John Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.