Literature DB >> 20443786

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: tumor markers as predictors of pathologic response, recurrence, and survival.

Lisa M Precht1, Kimberly A Lowe, Mary Atwood, J David Beatty.   

Abstract

This study reports the value of the tumor markers estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A community cancer center prospectively maintained breast cancer database containing over 8,000 patient records was used. Since 1989, 464 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and were tested for ER and PR. Estrogen receptor and/or PR positive patients were considered hormone receptor (HR) positive. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was available on 368 patients. Total, breast, and nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, recurrence, and overall survival were assessed. Total and breast pCR rates were higher in HR negative (HR-) patients (26% and 32%, respectively) than in HR positive (HR+) patients (4% and 7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Compared to HR+ patients, HR- patients had higher recurrence rates (38% versus 22%; p < 0.001), a shorter time to recurrence (1.28 versus 2.14 years; p < 0.001), and decreased overall survival (67% versus 81%; p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (NAT) demonstrated higher total pCR (34% versus 13%; p = 0.008), breast pCR (37% versus 17%; p = 0.02), and nodal pCR rates (47% versus 23%; p = 0.05) compared to HER2+ patients not treated with NAT. Furthermore, HER2+ patients who received NAT had lower recurrence rates (5% versus 42%; p < 0.001) and increased overall survival (97% versus 68%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, breast cancer HR status is predictive of total and breast pCR rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although HR- patients derive greater benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of pathologic response, they have worse outcomes in terms of recurrence and survival. Hormone receptor positive patients demonstrate significantly less response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but significantly better overall outcome. For both HR- and HR+, addition of NAT for HER2+ tumors results in both a superior response and outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443786     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00935.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  24 in total

1.  Predictive and prognostic factors in locally advanced breast cancer: effect of intratumoral FOXP3+ Tregs.

Authors:  Lutfiye Demir; Seyran Yigit; Hulya Ellidokuz; Cigdem Erten; Isil Somali; Yuksel Kucukzeybek; Ahmet Alacacioglu; Suna Cokmert; Alper Can; Murat Akyol; Ahmet Dirican; Vedat Bayoglu; Aysegul Akder Sari; Mustafa Oktay Tarhan
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Biologic characteristics of premalignant breast disease.

Authors:  Kimberly Cole; Maria Tabernero; Karen S Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers.

Authors:  Shahla Masood
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-09

4.  Pre-treatment hormonal receptor status and Ki67 index predict pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab/taxanes but not disease-free survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Guo-Chun Zhang; Xue-Ke Qian; Zi-Bai Guo; Chong-Yang Ren; Meng Yao; Xue-Rui Li; Kun Wang; Jian Zu; Ning Liao
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Association of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 following neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Authors:  Y-M Tsai; H-M Hsu; C-J Chen; K-F Hsu; H-L Fan; H Chang; D-C Chan; J-C Yu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for locally advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Domenico Angelucci; Nicola Tinari; Antonino Grassadonia; Ettore Cianchetti; Giampiero Ausili-Cefaro; Laura Iezzi; Marinella Zilli; Simona Grossi; Lucia Anna Ursini; Maria Teresa Scognamiglio; Graziella Castrilli; Michele De Tursi; Paolo Noccioli; Pasquale Cioffi; Stefano Iacobelli; Clara Natoli
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Prognostic value of receptor conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Xi Jin; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Sheng Chen; Ke-Da Yu; Zhi-Ming Shao; Gen-Hong Di
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-20

8.  HER2 Testing Characteristics Can Predict Residual Cancer Burden following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tamera J Lillemoe; Mara Rendi; Michaela L Tsai; Monica Knaack; Rina Yarosh; Erin Grimm; Barbara Susnik; Janet Krueger; Susan Olet; Karen K Swenson
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  The potential prognostic value of connexin 26 and 46 expression in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer.

Authors:  Ivett Teleki; Tibor Krenacs; Marcell A Szasz; Janina Kulka; Barna Wichmann; Cornelia Leo; Barbel Papassotiropoulos; Cosima Riemenschnitter; Holger Moch; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Effectiveness of neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Authors:  Clara Natoli; Patrizia Vici; Isabella Sperduti; Antonino Grassadonia; Giancarlo Bisagni; Nicola Tinari; Andrea Michelotti; Germano Zampa; Stefania Gori; Luca Moscetti; Michele De Tursi; Michele Panebianco; Maria Mauri; Ilaria Ferrarini; Laura Pizzuti; Corrado Ficorella; Riccardo Samaritani; Lucia Mentuccia; Stefano Iacobelli; Teresa Gamucci
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.