Literature DB >> 20442993

Organization of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene locus of the rat.

Jacobus Hendricks1, Peter Terpstra, Peter M Dammers, Rajesh Somasundaram, Annie Visser, Maaike Stoel, Nicolaas A Bos, Frans G M Kroese.   

Abstract

We have mapped and annotated the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy (IGH) gene locus of the Brown Norway (BN) rat (assembly V3.4; Rat Genomic Sequence Consortium). In addition to known variable region genes, we found 12 novel previously unidentified functional IGHV genes and 1 novel functional IGHD gene. In total, the variable region of the rat IGH locus is composed of at least 353 unique IGHV genes, 21 IGHD genes, and 5 IGHJ genes, of which 131, 14, and 4 are potentially functional genes, respectively. Of all species studied so far, the rat seems to have the highest number of functional IGHV genes in the genome. Rat IGHV genes can be classified into 13 IGHV families based on nucleotide sequence identity. The variable region of the BN rat spans a total length of approximately 4.9 Mb and is organized in a typical translocon organization. Like the mouse, members of the various IGHV gene families are more or less grouped together on the genome, albeit some members of IGHV gene families are found intermingled with each other. In the rat, the largest IGHV gene families are IGHV1, IGHV2, and IGHV5. The overall conclusion is that the genomic organization of the variable region of the rat IGH locus is strikingly similar to that of the mouse, illustrating the close evolutionary relationship between these two species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20442993      PMCID: PMC2890078          DOI: 10.1007/s00251-010-0448-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunogenetics        ISSN: 0093-7711            Impact factor:   2.846


Introduction

The antigen recognition site of an antibody is the product of a pairing set of immunoglobulin heavy (IGH) and immunoglobulin light (IGL) chain variable domains. Both the IGH-chain variable domain and the IGL-chain variable domain are composed of conserved framework sequences that alternate with three hypervariable regions, the complementary-determining regions (CDRs), which are responsible for actual antigen recognition. The variable domains of the IGH chain are encoded by three different genes (or gene segments): variable (IGHV), diversity (IGHD), and joining (IGHJ) genes. The IGH gene locus of most mammalian species contains a large number of IGHV genes, fewer IGHD genes, and some IGHJ genes (Marchalonis et al. 1998). In many species such as humans, mice, and rats, these gene segments recombine by DNA rearrangements during B-cell genesis in the bone marrow. These recombinations result in a so-called combinatorial diversity of the variable domain of the heavy chain (Yancopoulos and Alt 1986). Similarly, recombination of IGLV and IGLJ gene segments leads to the combinatorial diversity of IGL-chains. Imprecision of the rearrangements by addition or removal of nucleotides between the segments during the recombination process results in further enlargement of the primary repertoire of the variable domain of both IGH and IGL chains (junctional diversity). Another form of combinatorial diversity is created by the combination of IGH and IGL chains that are required to form the actual antigen recognition site. All mammals use combinatorial diversity (and junctional diversity) of IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes to form a diverse primary preimmune H-chain repertoire (Marchalonis et al. 1998). The extent of this combinatorial diversity varies, however, significantly between different species (Flajnik 2002; Marchalonis et al. 1998). Mammalian cross-species comparisons have demonstrated considerable divergence in the number and/or expression of IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes (Das et al. 2008; Flajnik 2002; Marchalonis et al. 1998). For example, the number of potentially functional germline IGHV genes may vary from only 20 in pigs (Butler et al. 2006) to >100 in rats and mice (Das et al. 2008; Johnston et al. 2006). Some mammalian species such as rabbit, sheep, and cow use only a very limited number of possible IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes (Dufour et al. 1996; Gontier et al. 2005; Mage et al. 2006; Saini et al. 1997). In chickens, even only one unique functional IGHV gene is present in the heavy-chain locus (Reynaud et al. 1995). Chickens and mammals that use only very few IGHV genes must therefore rely on additional mechanisms to compensate for the presence of a relatively limited combinatorial preimmune repertoire of their IGH chains. The strategies used to form a diverse primary IGH chain repertoire in these species include gene conversion in chickens and rabbits (Mage et al. 2006; Reynaud et al. 1995); hypermutation in chickens, sheep, and rabbits (Dufour et al. 1996; Gontier et al. 2005; Kothapalli et al. 2008; Mage et al. 2006; Reynaud et al. 1995); and extra-long H-CDR3 regions in cows (Saini et al. 1999). For a better understanding of the generation of the primary antibody repertoire during B-cell development and the changes (somatic hypermutations) that occur in this repertoire during humoral immune responses, detailed knowledge of the germline IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes and organization of the IGHVDJ locus are of critical importance. This information is also essential in giving insight into how various species have evolved different mechanisms to create a diverse preimmune specificity repertoire of their antibodies. With the unraveling of the mouse and human genomes, a detailed complete physical annotated map of the IGHVDJ locus has become available for these species (Johnston et al. 2006; Matsuda et al. 1998). One of the remarkable findings of these studies was that the number of functional IGHV genes in both species appeared to be much lower than previously estimated, whereas the number of nonfunctional IGHV genes [pseudogenes and open reading frame (ORF) genes lacking appropriate signal sequences] was relatively high. The genome of the rat has been unraveled, and there is a nearly complete sequence of the IGH locus (Gibbs et al. 2004). In rats, the exact number and location of IGHV genes are not known. Preliminary data suggest, however, that they are among the species with the highest number of (functional) IGHV genes in the genome (Das et al. 2008). Our previous studies (Dammers et al. 2000a) have indicated that, similar to the mouse, rat IGHV genes can be subdivided into IGHV gene families, on the basis of nucleotide sequence identity. IGHV genes belong to the same family when the IGHV genes share more than 80% of their nucleotides (Brodeur and Riblet 1984). We have detected previously the existence of at least 28 functional IGHV (germline) genes that belong to the IGHV5 family (PC7183) in the PVG rat strain (Dammers and Kroese 2001; Stoel et al. 2008). Here we present an annotated map of the variable region of the IGH locus of the Brown Norway (BN) rat, including not only functional and nonfunctional IGHV genes but also IGHD and IGHJ genes.

Materials and methods

Genomic sequence of the rat IGH locus

The genomic sequence of the BN/SsNHsdMCW rat (Rattus norvegicus) was generated by the Rat Genomic Sequence Consortium (RGSC) (Gibbs et al. 2004; Havlak et al. 2004). This sequence is available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Analysis of the variable region of the rat IGH gene locus, located on chromosome 6q32–33, was based on the Human Genome Sequencing Center assembly version RGSC V3.4 (November 2004 release; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA). Assembly RGSC V3.4 has been established in a hybrid approach combining the clone-by-clone method and the whole-genome shotgun method.

Mapping of the variable region of the BN rat

IGHV and IGHD gene sequences of the BN rat were obtained from the International Immunogenetics (IMGT) database (http://imgt.cines.fr) (Lefranc et al. 1999). IGHJ genes were taken from Lang and Mocikat (1991) (accession number X56791). Additional previously unreported IGHV genes were searched for in mapped and unmapped sequences of the rat genome. Unmapped sequences were taken from contigs in the “unplaced section” of the NCBI database or from newly established bactigs of the BN rat genome (Baylor College of Medicine; http://www.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu/projects/rat) not yet present in assembly RGSC V3.4. Nucleotide alignments were carried out using the NCBI BLASTN program (Altschul et al. 1990). New IGHV gene sequences were manually analyzed for the presence of an ORF of the coding region and for the presence of functional recombination signal sequences (RSS) and leader sequences using V-QUEST alignment software (http://www.imgt.cines.fr) (Giudicelli et al. 2004). Previously unreported IGHD genes were identified by searching manually in the genomic assembly RGSC V3.4 with sets of rat nonamer and heptamer sequences. The relative positions of the IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes on the chromosomal map were determined by aligning the encoding parts of the IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes (functional and nonfunctional) against the BN rat genome using the Genome Browser and BLAT programs (http://www.genome.ucsc.edu) (Karolchik et al. 2008; Kent 2002). Because of the relatively small size of IGHD genes, we included the IGHD 5′ and 3′ flanking RSS regions in the alignment. IGHD genes and flanking RSS were obtained from the IMGT database (accession numbers AABR03049813, AABR03051895, and M13798). The location of other predicted genes in the IGH locus was taken from NCBI annotation. The complete physical map and annotation of the genomic IGHVDJ region were drawn using the software package Genvision (Dnastar, Madison, WI, USA).

Nomenclature of rat IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes

IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ gene nomenclature and classification (functional, nonfunctional, ORF gene, and pseudogene) were adopted from the IMGT (Lefranc et al. 1999). Briefly, nonfunctional IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes are either genes with an intact ORF but erroneous regulatory sequences (“ORF genes”) or genes lacking a correct ORF (pseudogenes).

Results and discussion

Organization of the variable region of the IGH locus of the BN rat

Recently, DNA sequencing resulted in elucidation of the vast majority of the genomic nucleotide sequence of the BN rat, including the IGH locus located on chromosome 6q32–33 (Gibbs et al. 2004). The current IMGT database (Lefranc et al. 1999) contains 342 IGHV genes (120 functional and 222 nonfunctional), 20 IGHD genes (13 functional and 7 nonfunctional), and 5 IGHJ genes (4 functional and 1 nonfunctional). In order to establish a detailed chromosomal map of this part of the IGH locus containing the exact chromosomal location and orientation of the individual genes, we aligned the coding sequences of all known IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes (functional and nonfunctional) from the IMGT database to the rat genome assembly RGSC V3.4. As depicted in Fig. 1, the variable region of the IGH locus of the BN rat spans a total length of approximately 4.9 Mb and is organized in a typical translocon organization (many IGHV genes, a dozen IGHD genes, and a few IGHJ genes) similar to mice and humans. The locus has a telomeric to centromeric orientation and runs from the distally located IGHV7S16 gene towards the proximally located IGHJ4 gene. The upstream boundary of the IGHV region is marked by the non-IGH zinc-finger-protein type 386 gene, similar to the situation in mice (Johnston et al. 2006).
Fig. 1

Chromosomal map of the variable region of the IGH locus of the BN rat. Shown is the IGHV region from chromosome 6 ranging from gene Znf386 to IGHJ4 (RGSC V3.4: 138,451,833–143,326,393 bp). The map was established on the basis of the IMGT database (http://imgt.cines.fr), as indicated in “Materials and Methods,” and does not contain the 12 newly identified IGHV genes. Genes and their orientation are indicated by an arrow point. The IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes are numbered according to the IMGT nomenclature (Lefranc et al. 1999). Members of the same IGHV family share identical colors (non-IGHV genes are shown in gray). Nonfunctional genes are indicated with a “p” for pseudogene or with an “r” for ORF gene after the family number. The last number in the gene name is the rank number of the gene in the locus, starting at the centromeric end. Black dotted lines indicate near-perfect inverted repeats. Gaps in assembly V3.4 are marked by solid gray bars. This map is also available as an MS Excel file (Online Resource 1) and as a “bed”-type file (Online Resource 2) that can be projected on the current rat genome version V3.4 at the UCSC genome website (www.genome.ucsc.edu). These files can be found in “Supplementary Material”

Chromosomal map of the variable region of the IGH locus of the BN rat. Shown is the IGHV region from chromosome 6 ranging from gene Znf386 to IGHJ4 (RGSC V3.4: 138,451,833–143,326,393 bp). The map was established on the basis of the IMGT database (http://imgt.cines.fr), as indicated in “Materials and Methods,” and does not contain the 12 newly identified IGHV genes. Genes and their orientation are indicated by an arrow point. The IGHV, IGHD, and IGHJ genes are numbered according to the IMGT nomenclature (Lefranc et al. 1999). Members of the same IGHV family share identical colors (non-IGHV genes are shown in gray). Nonfunctional genes are indicated with a “p” for pseudogene or with an “r” for ORF gene after the family number. The last number in the gene name is the rank number of the gene in the locus, starting at the centromeric end. Black dotted lines indicate near-perfect inverted repeats. Gaps in assembly V3.4 are marked by solid gray bars. This map is also available as an MS Excel file (Online Resource 1) and as a “bed”-type file (Online Resource 2) that can be projected on the current rat genome version V3.4 at the UCSC genome website (www.genome.ucsc.edu). These files can be found in “Supplementary Material” The IGHV genes of the BN rat can be classified into 13 IGHV families based on nucleotide sequence identity (IGHV1, IGHV2, IGHV3, IGHV4, IGHV5, IGHV6, IGHV7, IGHV8, IGHV9, IGHV10, IGHV11, IGHV12, and IGHV15) (Table 1). In comparison to rats, the IGHV genes in humans and mice can be grouped together into 7 and 16 IGHV families, respectively. Most BN rat IGHV families are composed of various members, except for the IGHV15 family, which is composed of only one gene. In rats and mice, the various members (both functional and nonfunctional genes) of these IGHV families are more or less clustered together on the genome. The order of various IGHV families on the genome appears to be well preserved between rats and mice. Similar to mice (Johnston et al. 2006), the IGHV genes that belong to the IGHV1 and IGHV8 families are the most telomeric IGHV genes, whereas the members of the IGHV2 and IGHV5 families are located centromeric and closest to the IGHD genes. IGHV family members of the rat (and also of the mouse) are not completely spatially separated, and members of various IGHV families are frequently found intermingled with each other (e.g., IGHV2/IGHV5 and IGHV1/IGHV8 genes). The members of the IGHV1 family are more widely distributed over the locus and are mixed with members of various other IGHV gene families (such as IGHV7, IGHV8, IGHV11, etc.). In comparison to rat and mouse, the human IGHV family gene members are more extensively interspersed and less clustered on the IGH locus (Matsuda et al. 1998). The almost identical distribution pattern of IGHV gene families between mouse and rat strongly suggests a close evolutionary relationship shared between these species.
Table 1

Numbers of IGHV gene family members in the IGHV locus of the BN rat

IGHV gene familyNumber of IGHV genes
IMGT subgroupsa Previous mouse nomenclatureb Potentially functional genesc Nonfunctional genesc Total number of IGHV genes
IGHV1 J558254267
IGHV2 Q5239 (+ 4d)60 (+ 2)99 (+ 6)
IGHV3 36–60448
IGHV4 X-24224
IGHV5 718326 (+ 1)53 (+ 3)79 (+ 4)
IGHV6 J60681119
IGHV7 S107(T15)6915
IGHV8 360991019
IGHV9 VGAM3-8448
IGHV10 VH1021719
IGHV11 CP35712
IGHV12 CH27123
IGHV15 VH15A011
Total131 (+ 5)222 (+ 5)353 (+ 10)

The table also contains the 12 newly identified IGHV genes (see the text for further explanation).

aIGHV nomenclature according to IMGT.

bIGHV family nomenclature according to Brodeur and Riblet (1984).

cFunctional and nonfunctional (pseudogenes or ORF genes), according to IMGT standards.

dThe number of 100% identical genes is presented in parentheses.

Numbers of IGHV gene family members in the IGHV locus of the BN rat The table also contains the 12 newly identified IGHV genes (see the text for further explanation). aIGHV nomenclature according to IMGT. bIGHV family nomenclature according to Brodeur and Riblet (1984). cFunctional and nonfunctional (pseudogenes or ORF genes), according to IMGT standards. dThe number of 100% identical genes is presented in parentheses. The vast majority (>90%) of rat IGHV genes are orientated in the direction of the IGHD cluster, whereas a small number of IGHV genes have an inverted orientation (in the direction of the telomere). These inverted IGHV genes are grouped together on four inverted regions of the chromosomal map. Three of these regions are inverted repeats (positions 3.74, 3.79, and 4.76 Mb on the map of Fig. 1) containing eight pairs of 100% identical IGHV genes. The majority of the inverted IGHV genes are, however, located on a large inverted region of the IGHV locus (between the genes IGHV2S28p,39 and IGHV2S12,16) close to the centromeric end of the IGHV region of the locus. This area of the locus also contains a gene, IGHV5S47, which is identical to the noninverted gene IGHV5S8. These two genes are approximately 1.1 Mb separated from each other. We further noted the presence of another pair of identical IGHV genes (IGHV5S51p) located only 1,183 bp apart (Fig. 1; 3.41 Mb). In contrast to the other repeated pairs of genes, the latter pair of IGHV genes has the same (normal) orientation on the chromosome. If the rat VDJ locus indeed contains inverted regions, then this would imply that the VDJ recombination mechanism for these genes would use inversion instead of deletion. The presence of inverted repeats and completely 100% identical IGHV genes has not been identified in humans (Matsuda et al. 1998) and mice (Johnston et al. 2006). It might well be that the presence of inverted repeats in rats in the IGH locus may reflect inconsistencies in the current genome assembly (Worley et al. 2008). Our map must be therefore be taken as tentative, and it will be interesting to see whether an “upgraded” version of the rat genome sequences confirms the current assembly in regions with inverted repeats. In addition to IGHV genes, there are also six non-IGHV genes mapped on the IGHV gene locus (Fig. 1). A metallopeptidase domain 6 gene (Adam6) is found at the proximal end of this locus. Of the remaining five non-IGHV genes, two have reported annotations: nuclear-casein-dependent kinase substrate 1 (Nucks1) and the olfactory receptor pseudogene 874. These genes are located between IGHV1 and IGHV8 family members at the distal end of the IGHV gene locus. The other three genes are NCBI-predicted genes: homolog of the Brix domain gene BXDC1 (RGD1560842) and two prematurely terminated fragments of potential rat homologs (RGD1559843 and LOC691867). It is unknown whether these non-IGHV genes are functionally expressed. If these genes are functional, their expression might well be influenced by immunoglobulin enhancers as a consequence of the VDJ recombination process, or they may even be lost during this process. For these reasons, we assume that these non-IGHV genes in this locus are nonfunctional genes.

Identification of novel IGHV genes

The current assembly (RGSC V3.4) has a number of gaps in the IGHV region of the IGH locus (∼300 kb) of which the nucleotide sequence still has to be determined (Twigger et al. 2008). Approximately 7% of the variable region of the IGH locus has not been mapped yet. These regions are indicated in Fig. 1 as gap regions. The largest gap is found in the IGHV2–IGHV5 region (Fig. 1; between 3.6 and 3.7 Mb). These gaps may potentially contain novel IGHV genes. There are available genomic sequences of the BN rat that have not yet been incorporated into the current assembly (RGSC V3.4). These sequences are present as contigs and are grouped together as “unplaced sequences” in the NCBI database. To explore the presence of unidentified IGHV genes, we used BLASTN to align all IMGT-listed rat IGHV genes to the unplaced contigs NW_047922.1 and NW_047772.1. Contig NW_047922.1 contains genomic sequences that are not yet assigned to any specific chromosome, whereas contig NW_047772.1 contains genomic sequences that are specific for chromosome 6. This search resulted in the identification of 18 IGHV genes (17 genes in contig NW_ 047922.1 and 1 gene in contig NW_047772.1). All these 18 IGHV genes share 100% identity to an IGHV gene already present in the IMGT database. All other potential IGHV homologs (i.e., sequences with ≥80% identity with a known IGHV sequence in the IMGT database) found in unplaced sequences did not comply with the IMGT criteria for functional IGHV genes (Lefranc et al. 1999). Thus, the unplaced genomic sequences did not reveal any new previously unidentified rat IGHV genes. In addition to the unplaced sequences mentioned in the previous paragraph, there are also available bactig sequences (Baylor College of Medicine) that are not included in assembly RGSC V3.4. These bactigs are composed of overlapping bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) sequences that may contain sequences that could map on the gap regions of this assembly. We analyzed two nonoverlapping bactigs that span the entire variable region of the IGH locus, including the gap regions in assembly V3.4 (Fig. 1), for the presence of additional unreported IGHV genes. One of these bactigs (gpwy_grzy) (7.5 Mb) includes 71 BACs and extends into the major gap region. The other bactig (kdyb_kdzq; 1.65 Mb) is located centromeric to the largest gap region and consists of 18 overlapping BACs and probably also extends into the major gap region. Bactig gpwy_grzy did not reveal any previously unknown IGHV genes, although this bactig partially overlaps the major gap region. Because the nucleotide sequences of these BACs are currently not complete and also lack sufficient accuracy, this does not, however, imply that the major gap region does not contain any IGHV gene. On the other hand, 11 novel IGHV sequences that meet the IMGT criteria for functional germline IGHV genes (preliminary third-party annotation accession numbers BN001223–BN001233) were found in bactig kdyb_kdzq. These criteria include the appropriate sequence length, at least one ORF, a proper leader sequence, and a functional RSS (Lefranc et al. 1999). Furthermore, the flanking intron regions of these genes were not identical to the flanking regions of previously established IGHV genes already listed in the IMGT database. Based on sequence identity, five of these novel IGHV genes belong to the IGHV5 family (designated IGHV5-1 to IGHV5-5), and six belong to the IGHV2 family (designated IGHV2-1 to IGHV2-6). The finding that these novel IGHV genes all belong to either the IGHV2 family or the IGHV5 family is consistent with the notion that most gap regions are found in the area of the IGHV locus where members of these two IGHV families are located. To reveal whether these 11 newly identified IGHV genes are also functionally expressed in rearranged IGHVDJ transcripts, we aligned the newly identified IGHV sequences to the R. norvegicus nucleotide collection database of the NCBI. Two of these IGHV genes (IGHV2-3 and IGHV5-1) share a 100% identity with rearranged IGHVDJ BN rat complementary DNA sequences (accession numbers L07402 and X78897, respectively). In a recent study, we looked at the expression of IGHV5 genes in rat B-cell subsets (Hendricks et al., manuscript in preparation). We found the expression of 100% identical IGHV5-1 and IGHV5-2 genes in mature B cells. In addition, we detected another previously unidentified IGHV5 gene (named IGHV5-6). This IGHV gene is also 100% identical to the IGHV gene expressed in BN hybridoma Hg16 (Dammers et al. 2001) (accession number Z75899). These findings indicate that at least some of these novel germline genes are also functionally used.

Identification of an additional IGHD gene

So far, 20 (13 functional and 7 nonfunctional) IGHD genes have been described by the IMGT. We manually searched genomic assembly RGSC V3.4 for the presence of additional IGHD genes by using available RSS from functional rat IGHD genes. With this approach, we found a previously unidentified member of the IGHD1 subgroup (Fig. 1). Remarkedly, this gene, named IGHD1-9 (third-party annotation accession number pending), is located among IGHV2/IGHV5 genes ∼200 kb upstream of the IGHD gene cluster (Fig. 1). This IGHD gene contains an ORF and has functional RSS (12-bp spacer) flanking the gene on both sides (chromosomal coordinates can be found in supplementary files). Most probably, IGHD1-9 is also functionally expressed, since it is used in a rearranged IGHVDJ sequence (accession number AJ286179), albeit this IGHVDJ sequence is derived from another rat strain (PVG). The total number of functional IGHD genes in the BN rat is therefore most likely 14.

Concluding remarks

Together, our data imply that the total number of unique IGHV genes in the BN rat is at least 353 (see Table 1), including the 12 newly identified IGHV genes. In this estimate, the pairs of identical genes (ten pairs in total) are counted as one. Of these 353 IGHV genes, 131 (37%) meet all criteria for functional germline IGHV genes and can therefore be potentially expressed. The remaining genes are nonfunctional because they either do not have at least one ORF (pseudogenes) or lack an appropriate RSS (ORF genes). Nearly all nonfunctional IGHV genes are pseudogenes. It should be noted here that there may be more nonfunctional IGHV genes because the bactigs (see the previous discussion) were only analyzed for the presence of functional IGHV genes. Also in humans, the number of nonfunctional IGHV genes exceeds the number of functional IGHV genes (approximately one third) (Matsuda et al. 1998); however, in the mouse, there seems to be a higher number of functional (55%) IGHV genes than nonfunctional IGHV genes (Johnston et al. 2006). In general, however, there is a positive correlation between the number of functional IGHV genes and the number of nonfunctional IGHV genes (Das et al. 2008). The presence of large numbers of nonfunctional genes reflects the diversification of IGHV genes in evolution, as proposed before (Ota and Nei 1994). This process involves gene duplications and functional elimination after deleterious mutations (pseudogenes and ORF genes). The rat genome harbors the highest number of functional IGHV genes (at least 131) of all mammalian species studied so far (Table 1). The (antigen-independent) recombination of this large number of IGHV genes with one of the 14 IGHD genes and with one of the 4 IGHJ genes accounts for a more diverse combinatorial IGH repertoire in rats compared to other species. In addition, this repertoire is enlarged by junctional diversity, as illustrated by the presence of TdT in rat B-cell precursor cells (Opstelten et al. 1986) and variable numbers of N insertions in sequenced rat IGHV genes (Dammers et al. 2000b). Our main conclusion is that the overall organization of the variable region of the IGH locus and the distribution of IGHV family members in the rat are strikingly similar to the corresponding region in the mouse (Johnston et al. 2006), despite the fact that these two species diverged from each other 41 million years ago (Kumar and Hedges 1998). Also in the mouse, the IGHV1 (J558), IGHV2 (Q52), and IGHV5 (PC7183) gene families have the highest number of IGHV members. Both in rat and in mice, members of these families represent approximately two thirds of all functional IGHV genes. These genes therefore contribute the most to the available germline repertoire. In the mouse, the IGHV1 family (J588) is, by far, the largest IGHV family (almost half of all functional IGHV genes), whereas in the rat, the largest IGHV family is the IGHV2 (Q52) family, with 40 unique members (31% of all functional IGHV genes). Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. (XLS 32 kb) (TXT 23 kb)
  33 in total

1.  Evolutionary relationship between rat and mouse immunoglobulin IGHV5 subgroup genes (PC7183) and human IGHV3 subgroup genes.

Authors:  P M Dammers; F G Kroese
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.846

2.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Comparative analyses of immunoglobulin genes: surprises and portents.

Authors:  Martin F Flajnik
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  IMGT/V-QUEST, an integrated software program for immunoglobulin and T cell receptor V-J and V-D-J rearrangement analysis.

Authors:  Véronique Giudicelli; Denys Chaume; Marie-Paule Lefranc
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The Atlas genome assembly system.

Authors:  Paul Havlak; Rui Chen; K James Durbin; Amy Egan; Yanru Ren; Xing-Zhi Song; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Immunoglobulin VH-gene usage of autoantibodies in mercuric chloride-induced membranous glomerulopathy in the rat.

Authors:  P M Dammers; J C Bun; B Bellon; F G Kroese; J Aten; N A Bos
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Most marginal zone B cells in rat express germline encoded Ig VH genes and are ligand selected.

Authors:  P M Dammers; A Visser; E R Popa; P Nieuwenhuis; F G Kroese
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Richard A Gibbs; George M Weinstock; Michael L Metzker; Donna M Muzny; Erica J Sodergren; Steven Scherer; Graham Scott; David Steffen; Kim C Worley; Paula E Burch; Geoffrey Okwuonu; Sandra Hines; Lora Lewis; Christine DeRamo; Oliver Delgado; Shannon Dugan-Rocha; George Miner; Margaret Morgan; Alicia Hawes; Rachel Gill; Robert A Holt; Mark D Adams; Peter G Amanatides; Holly Baden-Tillson; Mary Barnstead; Soo Chin; Cheryl A Evans; Steve Ferriera; Carl Fosler; Anna Glodek; Zhiping Gu; Don Jennings; Cheryl L Kraft; Trixie Nguyen; Cynthia M Pfannkoch; Cynthia Sitter; Granger G Sutton; J Craig Venter; Trevor Woodage; Douglas Smith; Hong-Mei Lee; Erik Gustafson; Patrick Cahill; Arnold Kana; Lynn Doucette-Stamm; Keith Weinstock; Kim Fechtel; Robert B Weiss; Diane M Dunn; Eric D Green; Robert W Blakesley; Gerard G Bouffard; Pieter J De Jong; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Baoli Zhu; Marco Marra; Jacqueline Schein; Ian Bosdet; Chris Fjell; Steven Jones; Martin Krzywinski; Carrie Mathewson; Asim Siddiqui; Natasja Wye; John McPherson; Shaying Zhao; Claire M Fraser; Jyoti Shetty; Sofiya Shatsman; Keita Geer; Yixin Chen; Sofyia Abramzon; William C Nierman; Paul H Havlak; Rui Chen; K James Durbin; Amy Egan; Yanru Ren; Xing-Zhi Song; Bingshan Li; Yue Liu; Xiang Qin; Simon Cawley; Kim C Worley; A J Cooney; Lisa M D'Souza; Kirt Martin; Jia Qian Wu; Manuel L Gonzalez-Garay; Andrew R Jackson; Kenneth J Kalafus; Michael P McLeod; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Davinder Virk; Andrei Volkov; David A Wheeler; Zhengdong Zhang; Jeffrey A Bailey; Evan E Eichler; Eray Tuzun; Ewan Birney; Emmanuel Mongin; Abel Ureta-Vidal; Cara Woodwark; Evgeny Zdobnov; Peer Bork; Mikita Suyama; David Torrents; Marina Alexandersson; Barbara J Trask; Janet M Young; Hui Huang; Huajun Wang; Heming Xing; Sue Daniels; Darryl Gietzen; Jeanette Schmidt; Kristian Stevens; Ursula Vitt; Jim Wingrove; Francisco Camara; M Mar Albà; Josep F Abril; Roderic Guigo; Arian Smit; Inna Dubchak; Edward M Rubin; Olivier Couronne; Alexander Poliakov; Norbert Hübner; Detlev Ganten; Claudia Goesele; Oliver Hummel; Thomas Kreitler; Young-Ae Lee; Jan Monti; Herbert Schulz; Heike Zimdahl; Heinz Himmelbauer; Hans Lehrach; Howard J Jacob; Susan Bromberg; Jo Gullings-Handley; Michael I Jensen-Seaman; Anne E Kwitek; Jozef Lazar; Dean Pasko; Peter J Tonellato; Simon Twigger; Chris P Ponting; Jose M Duarte; Stephen Rice; Leo Goodstadt; Scott A Beatson; Richard D Emes; Eitan E Winter; Caleb Webber; Petra Brandt; Gerald Nyakatura; Margaret Adetobi; Francesca Chiaromonte; Laura Elnitski; Pallavi Eswara; Ross C Hardison; Minmei Hou; Diana Kolbe; Kateryna Makova; Webb Miller; Anton Nekrutenko; Cathy Riemer; Scott Schwartz; James Taylor; Shan Yang; Yi Zhang; Klaus Lindpaintner; T Dan Andrews; Mario Caccamo; Michele Clamp; Laura Clarke; Valerie Curwen; Richard Durbin; Eduardo Eyras; Stephen M Searle; Gregory M Cooper; Serafim Batzoglou; Michael Brudno; Arend Sidow; Eric A Stone; J Craig Venter; Bret A Payseur; Guillaume Bourque; Carlos López-Otín; Xose S Puente; Kushal Chakrabarti; Sourav Chatterji; Colin Dewey; Lior Pachter; Nicolas Bray; Von Bing Yap; Anat Caspi; Glenn Tesler; Pavel A Pevzner; David Haussler; Krishna M Roskin; Robert Baertsch; Hiram Clawson; Terrence S Furey; Angie S Hinrichs; Donna Karolchik; William J Kent; Kate R Rosenbloom; Heather Trumbower; Matt Weirauch; David N Cooper; Peter D Stenson; Bin Ma; Michael Brent; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; David Shteynberg; Richard R Copley; Martin S Taylor; Harold Riethman; Uma Mudunuri; Jane Peterson; Mark Guyer; Adam Felsenfeld; Susan Old; Stephen Mockrin; Francis Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (Igh-V) locus in the mouse. I. One hundred Igh-V genes comprise seven families of homologous genes.

Authors:  P H Brodeur; R Riblet
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  What everybody should know about the rat genome and its online resources.

Authors:  Simon N Twigger; Kim D Pruitt; Xosé M Fernández-Suárez; Donna Karolchik; Kim C Worley; Donna R Maglott; Garth Brown; George Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs; Jim Kent; Ewan Birney; Howard J Jacob
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity of Memory Marginal Zone B Cells.

Authors:  Jacobus Hendricks; Nicolaas A Bos; Frans G M Kroese
Journal:  Crit Rev Immunol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Genetic removal of the CH1 exon leads to the production of hypofunctional heavy chain-only IgG2a in rats.

Authors:  Zhenrong Li; Ming Zhang; Shunan Zheng; Yu Song; Xueqian Cheng; Di Yu; Lijuan Du; Liming Ren; Haitang Han; Yaofeng Zhao
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Characterization of the torafugu (Takifugu rubripes) immunoglobulin heavy chain gene locus.

Authors:  Xi Fu; Hong Zhang; Engkong Tan; Shugo Watabe; Shuichi Asakawa
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  A preliminary analysis of the immunoglobulin genes in the African elephant (Loxodonta africana).

Authors:  Yongchen Guo; Yonghua Bao; Hui Wang; Xiaoxiang Hu; Zhihui Zhao; Ning Li; Yaofeng Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Factors important in evolutionary shaping of immunoglobulin gene loci.

Authors:  Michal Barak; Guy Eilat; Ron Unger; Ramit Mehr
Journal:  Immunome Res       Date:  2010-12-06

6.  Immunoglobulin genomics in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  Yongchen Guo; Yonghua Bao; Qingwen Meng; Xiaoxiang Hu; Qingyong Meng; Liming Ren; Ning Li; Yaofeng Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The formation of mutated IgM memory B cells in rat splenic marginal zones is an antigen dependent process.

Authors:  Jacobus Hendricks; Annie Visser; Peter M Dammers; Johannes G M Burgerhof; Nicolaas A Bos; Frans G M Kroese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A primer set for the rapid isolation of scFv fragments against cell surface antigens from immunised rats.

Authors:  Francesco Nannini; Farhaan Parekh; Patrycja Wawrzyniecka; Leila Mekkaoui; Matteo Righi; Fatemeh V Dastjerdi; Jenny Yeung; Claire Roddie; Yuchen Bai; Biao Ma; Mathieu Ferrari; Shimobi Onuoha; Kerry Chester; Martin Pule
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.