| Literature DB >> 20441582 |
Hongtao Xu1, Yongxiu Yao, Lorraine P Smith, Venugopal Nair.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Micro(mi)RNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs that play critical roles in the induction of various cancers, including lymphomas induced by oncogenic viruses. While some of the miRNAs are oncogenic, miRNAs such as miR-26a are consistently downregulated in a number of cancers, demonstrating their potential tumor suppressor functions. Global miRNA expression profiles of a number of virus-transformed avian lymphoma cell lines have shown downregulation of gga-miR-26a expression, irrespective of molecular mechanisms of transformation or the viral aetiology. The neoplastic transformation of lymphocytes by many viruses accompanies high levels of proliferative responses, mostly mediated through cytokines such as IL-2. Chicken IL-2 can modulate T-cell proliferation and cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo and dysregulation of IL-2 expression is observed in diseases such as leukaemia.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20441582 PMCID: PMC2873332 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2867-10-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Figure 1Downregulation of gga-miR-26a in transformed cell lines. Reduced expression of miR-26a in MDV (MSB-1, T226S, T265L and T273S), ALV (HP45) and REV (AVOL1 and AVOL2)-transformed cell lines. (a) Heat map of miR-26a expression in tumour cell lines compared with the levels in splenocytes as the reference. Log2 values of increased (red) and reduced (green) expression are shown. (b) Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted from the above cell lines and unsorted splenocytes or sorted CD4+/CD4- cells with the anti-miR-26a probe showing differences in the miR-26a expression. U6 RNA was used as the control probe for loading control.
Figure 2Chicken IL-2 is a target for miR-26a. (a) Nucleotide sequences of the wild-type and mutant miR-26a binding sites (mutated residues underlined) located in the 3' UTR of Gallus gallus IL-2 gene (NM_204153). (b) Reporter assays on DF-1 cells transfected with the reporter vectors containing either the wildtype or mutated IL-2 3' UTR. Reduction in the ratio of Renilla to Firefly luciferase levels (p < 0.05) in the wildtype construct to the normalised 100 per cent levels for the mutant construct is shown.
Figure 3Western blot analysis of the IL-2 expression. DF-1 cells transfected with pcDNA-IL-2-3HA-3'UTR wild-type or mutant constructs were detected using anti-HA tag antibody. The levels of α-tubulin in the cell lysates are also shown as the loading control.
Figure 4Regulation of chicken IL-2 expression by miR-26a in DF-1 cells. (a) Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted from DF-1 cells transfected with miR-26a expression or control vectors using anti-miR-26a probe. (b) Northern blot analysis demonstrating the specific silencing of miR-26a expression with anti-miR-26a, but not with anti-miRNA control. U6 RNA was used as the control probe for loading control. (c) Western blot analysis of chicken IL-2 expression in DF-1 cells co-transfected with HA-tagged IL-2 expression construct pcDNA-IL-2-3HA-3'UTR and miR-26a expression vector (lane 2) or control vector (lane 3) using anti-HA tag antibody. (d) Western blot analysis of the IL-2 levels in the presence of anti-miR-26a or anti-miRNA control with anti-HA tag antibody. The levels of α-tubulin in the cell lysates are also shown as the loading control. Quantitation of the band densities was carried out using ImageQuant 300 software.