PURPOSE: To identify obese patients' disability features considering the level of body impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions in relation to environmental factors' effect. METHOD: Adult obese inpatients (BMI > 35) were enrolled and were administered a set of 166 ICF categories. Count-based indexes were developed for each ICF component: correlations and regression on performance and capacity indexes were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (62.7% females, mean age 38.1) entered in the study. Description of ICF-based disability components is reported. Capacity is better correlated with body functions (r = 0.619, P < 0.01) and body structures (r = 0.375, P < 0.01) than performance; on the contrary, environmental barriers are correlated better with performance (r = 0.531, P < 0.01) than with capacity. Impairments in body functions and environmental barriers are the best predictors of limitations both in capacity and in performance. CONCLUSIONS: Through this multidisciplinary approach, supported by ICFs biopsychosocial model, we described functioning and disability in obese patients, highlighting the strong effect of body functions' impairments and the limited one of environmental factors. This approach can guide rehabilitation programmes, the promotion of positive health outcomes and the modification of patients' lifestyle, not only intended as an issue of barriers' elimination, but as the activation and maintenance of environmental facilitators.
PURPOSE: To identify obesepatients' disability features considering the level of body impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions in relation to environmental factors' effect. METHOD: Adult obese inpatients (BMI > 35) were enrolled and were administered a set of 166 ICF categories. Count-based indexes were developed for each ICF component: correlations and regression on performance and capacity indexes were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (62.7% females, mean age 38.1) entered in the study. Description of ICF-based disability components is reported. Capacity is better correlated with body functions (r = 0.619, P < 0.01) and body structures (r = 0.375, P < 0.01) than performance; on the contrary, environmental barriers are correlated better with performance (r = 0.531, P < 0.01) than with capacity. Impairments in body functions and environmental barriers are the best predictors of limitations both in capacity and in performance. CONCLUSIONS: Through this multidisciplinary approach, supported by ICFs biopsychosocial model, we described functioning and disability in obesepatients, highlighting the strong effect of body functions' impairments and the limited one of environmental factors. This approach can guide rehabilitation programmes, the promotion of positive health outcomes and the modification of patients' lifestyle, not only intended as an issue of barriers' elimination, but as the activation and maintenance of environmental facilitators.
Authors: H Precilios; A Brunani; V Cimolin; E Tacchini; L M Donini; S Fabris De Souza; P Capodaglio Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Matilde Leonardi; Andrea Martinuzzi; Paolo Meucci; Marina Sala; Emanuela Russo; Mara Buffoni; Alberto Raggi Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2012-02-01
Authors: Amelia Brunani; Alberto Raggi; Anna Sirtori; Maria Elisa Berselli; Valentina Villa; Francesca Ceriani; Stefania Corti; Matilde Leonardi; Paolo Capodaglio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Monira I Aldhahi; Wafa K Al Khalil; Rawan B Almutiri; Mada M Alyousefi; Bayader S Alharkan; Haya AnNasban Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 3.390