Literature DB >> 20440475

Subjective versus objective measurement of surgical outcomes of treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: it is not just black and white.

Berna Haliloglu, Diaa E E Rizk.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20440475     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-010-1158-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  EGGS for patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Bob Shull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-12

Review 2.  Outcome measures and definition of cure in female stress urinary incontinence surgery: a survey of recent publications.

Authors:  Peter A Castillo; Luis M Espaillat-Rijo; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Female stress urinary incontinence: how do patient and physician perspectives correlate in assessment of outcomes?

Authors:  Priya Padmanabhan; Victor W Nitti
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence.

Authors:  Ilker Yalcin; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Is there a discrepancy between patient and physician quality of life assessment?

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo; Juan Gonzalez
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice.

Authors:  G Ghoniem; E Stanford; K Kenton; C Achtari; R Goldberg; T Mascarenhas; M Parekh; K Tamussino; S Tosson; G Lose; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-11-17
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Definition of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse: is it really important?

Authors:  Stefano Salvatore; Gabriele Siesto; Diaa E E Rizk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Contasure-Needleless compared with transobturator-TVT for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Lluís Amat I Tardiu; Eva Martínez Franco; Josep Maria Laïlla Vicens
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Contasure-needleless® compared with Monarc® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez; Eva Martinez Franco; Xinxin Lin Miao; Lluis Amat Tardiu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Contasure-Needleless® single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: long-term results.

Authors:  Eva Martinez Franco; Lluís Amat Tardiu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Reporting and grading of complications after mid-urethral sling surgeries: Could the "Clavien-Dindo Classification" be adopted?

Authors:  Ahmed S El-Hefnawy; Bassem S Wadie
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-05-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.