Literature DB >> 25030327

Contasure-Needleless® single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: long-term results.

Eva Martinez Franco1, Lluís Amat Tardiu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study compared transobturator tension-free vaginal tape (TVT-O®) and Contasure-Needleless (C-NDL®) at long-term follow-up .
METHODS: Non-inferiority, prospective, single-centre , quasi-randomised trial started in September 2006 and finished in April 2011 to compare C-NDL® with transobturator vaginal tape (TVT-O®) mesh in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) . Epidemiological information, intraoperative and postoperative complications, subjective estimates of blood loss and pain levels were recorded. We also analysed the postoperative stress test, the subjective impression of improvement using the Sandvik Severity Index and the quality of life during follow-up using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) .
RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven women with primary SUI were scheduled to receive TVT-O® or C-NDL® and were followed up at least 3 years after the procedure . One hundred and eleven women in the C-NDL® group (84.7%) had a negative stress test, compared with 54 women (88.9%) in the TVT-O® group (p = 0.0065 for the non-inferiority test). The postoperative Sandvik Severity Index was 0 or better than the preoperative score in 90.7% of patients in the C-NDL® group and 95.4% of patients in the TVT-O® group (p = 0.0022). The complication rate was similar in both groups. There were significant differences (p = 0.02) in postoperative pain within the TVT-O® group. The degree of satisfaction was not statistically significant between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes for the C-NDL® group were similar to those of the TVT-O® group, adding the concept of "single incision tape" to the tension-free sling option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030327     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2475-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  27 in total

1.  Subjective versus objective measurement of surgical outcomes of treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: it is not just black and white.

Authors:  Berna Haliloglu; Diaa E E Rizk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Mark D Schleinitz; Charles R Rardin; Renee M Ward; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes in women treated by the TVT-O procedure.

Authors:  J l Lim; A Cornish; M P Carey
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Four-year functional results of the suburethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a French prospective randomized multicentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes.

Authors:  Marcos Ballester; Charles Bui; Jean-Luc Frobert; Maryelle Grisard-Anaf; Jean Lienhart; Herve Fernandez; Emmanuel David-Montefiore; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Surgical management of female SUI: is there a gold standard?

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn; Livia Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Massimo Porena; Elisabetta Costantini; Bruno Frea; Antonella Giannantoni; Stefania Ranzoni; Luigi Mearini; Vittorio Bini; Ervin Kocjancic
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  [Analysis of the efficacy and complications of the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: retropubic and transobturator TVT. Our experience].

Authors:  Irene Mora Hervás; Lluís Amat Tardiu; Eva Martínez Franco; Josep María Lailla Vicens
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.436

8.  The safety of the inside-out transobturator approach for transvaginal tape (TVT-O) treatment in stress urinary incontinence: French registry data on 984 women.

Authors:  Pierre Collinet; Calin Ciofu; Pierre Costa; Michel Cosson; Bruno Deval; Philippe Grise; Bernard Jacquetin; Francois Haab
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-01-15

9.  Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out.

Authors:  Jean de Leval
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice.

Authors:  G Ghoniem; E Stanford; K Kenton; C Achtari; R Goldberg; T Mascarenhas; M Parekh; K Tamussino; S Tosson; G Lose; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-11-17
View more
  6 in total

1.  A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  René P Schellart; Sandra E Zwolsman; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Dirk J M K de Ridder; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Contasure-needleless® compared with Monarc® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez; Eva Martinez Franco; Xinxin Lin Miao; Lluis Amat Tardiu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.

Authors:  Ozan Dogan; Aski Ellibes Kaya; Cigdem Pulatoglu; Alper Basbug; Murat Yassa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  René P Schellart; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Frank Van der Aa; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Bart Kimpe; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Focusing on long-term complications of mid-urethral slings among women with stress urinary incontinence as a patient safety improvement measure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Hao Lin; Cheng-Kai Lee; Shuenn-Dyh Chang; Pei-Chun Chien; Yu-Ying Hsu; Ling-Hong Tseng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Contasure-needleless single incision slings versus transobturator slings (TOT/TVT-O) for female patients with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenkai Luo; Binbin Jiao; Hang Zhao; Hailong Liu; Shicong Lai; Guan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.264

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.