Literature DB >> 20440219

Application of the ICare rebound tonometer in healthy infants.

Anna Lundvall1, Helena Svedberg, Enping Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer (RBT) and to establish reference values of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in healthy infants. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Forty-six children were recruited. In 6 infants aged 3 to 18 months, it was not possible to conduct the examination. Five children refused all cooperation. In 1 child, only 1 reading was obtained. In 1, partly uncooperative infant, the difference between the highest and the lowest reading exceeded 3 mm Hg (a difference of 7 mm Hg). These 7 infants were excluded. Totally 39 children, 22 girls and 17 boys, aged 1 month to 36 months were included in the study. The mean age was 14±9 months [mean ± standard deviation (SD)]. One randomly selected eye of each child was examined with the ICare RBT. Three consecutive readings were made. In 10 children, IOP measurements were conducted twice with an interval of 10 to 30 minutes by 2 different ophthalmologists.
RESULTS: The mean IOP value of the 39 infants was 11.82±2.67 mm Hg. The median value was 10 mm Hg with a range of 7.3 to 17.0 mm Hg. In 10 children, the IOP was determined by 2 examiners. The results were virtually identical with differences of 0 to 1 mm Hg in 9 out of 10 children. The mean difference between Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 (0.77 mm Hg) was not statistically significant (P>0.20). The examinations were very well tolerated, and no child showed any sign of discomfort during or after the examination.
CONCLUSIONS: The hand-held RBT in the present study is easy to use, it does not require topical anesthesia and it is very well tolerated by cooperative infants. However, 7 out of 46 infants refused cooperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20440219     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181d1d1ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  10 in total

1.  Age variations in intraocular pressure in a cohort of healthy Austrian school children.

Authors:  W A Dusek; B K Pierscionek; J F McClelland
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Does patient comfort influence the choice of tonometer for the measurement of intraocular pressure?

Authors:  Mary O Ugalahi; Mukaila A Seidu; Bolutife A Olusanya; Aderonke M Baiyeroju
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Childhood Glaucoma under Standardized General Anaesthesia: The Prospective EyeBIS Study.

Authors:  Alicja Strzalkowska; Nina Pirlich; Julia V Stingl; Alexander K Schuster; Jasmin Rezapour; Felix M Wagner; Justus Buse; Esther M Hoffmann
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Binding of a glaucoma-associated myocilin variant to the αB-crystallin chaperone impedes protein clearance in trabecular meshwork cells.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lynch; Bing Li; Parvaneh Katoli; Chuanxi Xiang; Barrett Leehy; Nalini Rangaswamy; Veronica Saenz-Vash; Y Karen Wang; Hong Lei; Thomas B Nicholson; Erik Meredith; Dennis S Rice; Ganesh Prasanna; Amy Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The utility of rebound tonometer in late elderly subjects.

Authors:  Rei Sakata; Jiro Numaga
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Intraocular pressure monitoring by rebound tonometry in children with myopia.

Authors:  Jenchieh Weng; I-Lun Tsai; Li-Lin Kuo; Ching-Yao Tsai; Lin-Chung Woung; Ya-Chuan Hsiao
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

7.  Mutant myocilin impacts sarcomere ultrastructure in mouse gastrocnemius muscle.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lynch; Andrew J Dolman; Chenying Guo; Katie Dolan; Chuanxi Xiang; Samir Reda; Bing Li; Ganesh Prasanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of Icare Pro Tonometry and Icare One Tonometry Measurements in Healthy Eyes

Authors:  Hüseyin Mayalı; Çağlar Sarıgül; Emin Kurt; Özcan Rasim Kayıkçıoğlu; Süleyman Sami İlker
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-27

9.  Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study.

Authors:  Annegret Hella Dahlmann-Noor; Renata Puertas; Shenille Tabasa-Lim; Ahmed El-Karmouty; Mustafa Kadhim; Nicholas Kloster Wride; Amanda Lewis; Dawn Grosvenor; Poornima Rai; Maria Papadopoulos; John Brookes; Catey Bunce; Peng Tee Khaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Intraocular pressure in a cohort of healthy eastern European schoolchildren: variations in method and corneal thickness.

Authors:  Patrycja Krzyżanowska-Berkowska; Magdalena Asejczyk-Widlicka; Barbara Pierscionek
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.