Literature DB >> 20440160

BMP-4 response in wild-type and craniosynostotic rabbit bone cells.

Gregory M Cooper1, Emily L Lensie, James J Cray, Gary E DeCesare, Melissa A Smalley, Joseph E Losee, Mark P Mooney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis results from improper regulation of bone formation. Investigations of cells derived from patients with craniosynostosis suggest that craniosynostotic bone-derived cells have increased osteogenic or proliferative capacities compared with other cells. Research into the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis using cells derived from children has been hindered by small sample sizes and inappropriate control cell populations. The authors hypothesized that cells derived from suture-associated regions of bone from craniosynostotic rabbits were more osteogenic and proliferative than bone cells derived from wild-type rabbits.
METHODS: This study used cells derived from a colony of rabbits with congenital, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (n = 20) or from age-matched wild-type rabbits (n = 20). Bone cells derived from either suture-associated or non-suture-associated bone were challenged with osteogenic stimuli and assessed for osteogenic differentiation.
RESULTS: The results suggest a high level of variability among cells derived from different individual rabbits. Also, craniosynostotic bone cells have a larger response to recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 4 stimulation relative to baseline expression of alkaline phosphatase, although overall alkaline phosphatase expression was higher in wild-type bone cells. Cell proliferation showed some differences at 3 days in culture, but no differences were found at 7 days in culture.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that bone cells in this rabbit model of craniosynostosis are generally similar to wild-type cells. Also, because of variability, it is necessary to have larger sample sizes than are normally available in human studies. Therefore, cells from the rabbit model may be a powerful in vitro model for further craniosynostosis research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20440160     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d62ad4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  3 in total

1.  Tissue interactions between craniosynostotic dura mater and bone.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Emily L Durham; James J Cray; Michael I Siegel; Joseph E Losee; Mark P Mooney
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Effects of thyroxine exposure on the Twist 1 +/- phenotype: A test of gene-environment interaction modeling for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Emily L Durham; R Nicole Howie; Laurel Black; Grace Bennfors; Trish E Parsons; Mohammed Elsalanty; Jack C Yu; Seth M Weinberg; James J Cray
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-07-20

3.  A variant associated with sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis alters the regulatory function of a non-coding element.

Authors:  Cristina M Justice; Jinoh Kim; Sun-Don Kim; Kyunhgho Kim; Garima Yagnik; Araceli Cuellar; Blake Carrington; Chung-Ling Lu; Raman Sood; Simeon A Boyadjiev; Alexander F Wilson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.802

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.