Literature DB >> 20439270

Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.

Zohar Yosibash1, David Tal, Nir Trabelsi.   

Abstract

High-order finite-element (FE) analyses with inhomogeneous isotropic material properties have been shown to predict the strains and displacements on the surface of the proximal femur with high accuracy when compared with in vitro experiments. The same FE models with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties produce results similar to those obtained with isotropic material properties. Herein, we investigate the yield prediction capabilities of these models using four different yield criteria, and the spread in the predicted load between the isotropic and orthotropic material models. Subject-specific high-order FE models of two human femurs were generated from CT scans with inhomogeneous orthotropic or isotropic material properties, and loaded by a simple compression force at the head. Computed strains and stresses by both the orthotropic and isotropic FE models were used to determine the load that predicts 'yielding' by four different 'yield criteria': von Mises, Drucker-Prager, maximum principal stress and maximum principal strain. One of the femurs was loaded by a simple load until fracture, and the force resulting in yielding was compared with the FE predicted force. The surface average of the 'maximum principal strain' criterion in conjunction with the orthotropic FE model best predicts both the yield force and fracture location compared with other criteria. There is a non-negligible influence on the predictions if orthotropic or isotropic material properties are applied to the FE model. All stress-based investigated 'yield criteria' have a small spread in the predicted failure. Because only one experiment was performed with a rather simplified loading configuration, the conclusions of this work cannot be claimed to be either reliable or sufficient, and future experiments should be performed to further substantiate the conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20439270     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  9 in total

Review 1.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Diet of Mesozoic toothed birds (Longipterygidae) inferred from quantitative analysis of extant avian diet proxies.

Authors:  Case Vincent Miller; Michael Pittman; Xiaoli Wang; Xiaoting Zheng; Jen A Bright
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.364

4.  Patient-specific finite element modeling for femoral bone augmentation.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Robert S Armiger; Michael D Kutzer; Stephen M Belkoff; Simon C Mears; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  A quasi-brittle continuum damage finite element model of the human proximal femur based on element deletion.

Authors:  Ridha Hambli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Hans Liebl; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Fabian Holzner; Peter B Noel; Rainer Burgkart; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development and validation of a computational model of the knee joint for the evaluation of surgical treatments for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Mootanah; C W Imhauser; F Reisse; D Carpanen; R W Walker; M F Koff; M W Lenhoff; S R Rozbruch; A T Fragomen; Z Dewan; Y M Kirane; K Cheah; J K Dowell; H J Hillstrom
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Comparative cranial biomechanics in two lizard species: impact of variation in cranial design.

Authors:  Hugo Dutel; Flora Gröning; Alana C Sharp; Peter J Watson; Anthony Herrel; Callum F Ross; Marc E H Jones; Susan E Evans; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Study of the variations of fall induced hip fracture risk between right and left femurs using CT-based FEA.

Authors:  Tanvir R Faisal; Yunhua Luo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.