Literature DB >> 20438300

Fit to targets, preferred listening levels, and self-reported outcomes for the DSL v5.0 a hearing aid prescription for adults.

Melissa J Polonenko1, Susan D Scollie, Sheila Moodie, Richard C Seewald, Diana Laurnagaray, Juliane Shantz, Andrea Richards.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated how closely the DSL v5.0 a prescription could be approximated with hearing aids, its relationship to preferred listening levels (PLLs) of adults with acquired hearing loss, and the self-reported outcomes of the resulting fittings. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty adults with varying degrees and configurations of hearing loss ranging from mild to severe.
METHODS: Hearing aid output was measured after the initial fitting to DSL v5.0 a targets and after determination of the PLL after approximately 90 days. The Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) was used to evaluate outcome.
RESULTS: The 95% confidence interval of fits to target ranged from 5.8 to 8.4 dB across frequency. The DSL v5.0 a adult algorithm approximated the PLLs of the participants within 2.6 dB on average. Hearing aid fittings provided positive subjective outcome improvements on the COSI.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the use of DSL v5.0 a for the fitting of hearing aids on adults with acquired hearing loss was feasible and provided an appropriate initial fitting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438300     DOI: 10.3109/14992021003713122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  13 in total

Review 1.  Evidence on self-fitting hearing aids.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-04-23

2.  Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.

Authors:  Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Temporal resolution with a prescriptive fitting formula.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 4.  Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Richard A Roberts; Gina Angley; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

5.  Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Ruth A Bentler; Patricia A Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Frequency-based multi-band adaptive compression for hearing aid application.

Authors:  Kashyap Patel; Issa M S Panahi
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2020-06-22

7.  Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Trevor T Perry; Melanie Gregan; Dianne VanTasell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Self-Reported Benefit and Satisfaction with a Beamforming Body-Worn Hearing Aid for Elderly Adults.

Authors:  Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-01

9.  Audiology and speech-language pathology practice in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmad A Alanazi
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

10.  Hearing Aids Benefit Recognition of Words in Emotional Speech but Not Emotion Identification.

Authors:  Huiwen Goy; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.