Literature DB >> 20438265

The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.

Colin M MacLeod1, Nigel Gopie, Kathleen L Hourihan, Karen R Neary, Jason D Ozubko.   

Abstract

In 8 recognition experiments, we investigated the production effect-the fact that producing a word aloud during study, relative to simply reading a word silently, improves explicit memory. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 showed the effect to be restricted to within-subject, mixed-list designs in which some individual words are spoken aloud at study. Because the effect was not evident when the same repeated manual or vocal overt response was made to some words (Experiment 4), producing a subset of studied words appears to provide additional unique and discriminative information for those words-they become distinctive. This interpretation is supported by observing a production effect in Experiment 5, in which some words were mouthed (i.e., articulated without speaking); in Experiment 6, in which the materials were pronounceable nonwords; and even in Experiment 7, in which the already robust generation effect was incremented by production. Experiment 8 incorporated a semantic judgment and showed that the production effect was not due to "lazy reading" of the words studied silently. The distinctiveness that accrues to the records of produced items at the time of study is useful at the time of test for discriminating these produced items from other items. The production effect represents a simple but quite powerful mechanism for improving memory for selected information. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438265     DOI: 10.1037/a0018785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  43 in total

1.  I said, you said: the production effect gets personal.

Authors:  Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Jason D Ozubko; Nigel Gopie; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

3.  Auditory-motor learning influences auditory memory for music.

Authors:  Rachel M Brown; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

4.  The next generation: the value of reminding.

Authors:  Colin M MacLeod; Molly M Pottruff; Noah D Forrin; Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

5.  Widening the boundaries of the production effect.

Authors:  Noah D Forrin; Colin M Macleod; Jason D Ozubko
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

6.  How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Veit Kubik; Max Larsson Sundqvist; Ivo Todorov; Bert Jonsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-31

7.  Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect?

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

8.  Directed forgetting of visual symbols: evidence for nonverbal selective rehearsal.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Jason D Ozubko; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

9.  Mechanisms of output interference in cued recall.

Authors:  Jack H Wilson; David Kellen; Amy H Criss
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

10.  A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness.

Authors:  Brian M Siefke; Troy A Smith; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.