OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of high altitude on reaction time (RT) mean and intra-individual variability. METHOD: Ten students (6 men, 4 women) took a 4-choice RT test and had their vital signs and Lake Louise (LL) score measured on 21 occasions during the Edinburgh Altitude Research Expedition of 2008 to the Western Himalayas (max. altitude 5,565 m). RESULTS: Linear mixed modeling revealed that mean RT was significantly impaired at altitudes above 4,000 m (p < .001), but relatively unaffected below that threshold. An estimated increase in RT between 4,000 and 5,000 m was 15.5 ms, 95% CI [11.1, 19.9]. LL score was related to slower RTs (B = 1.97, 95% CI [0.70, 3.23], p < .01), while number of errors was associated with faster RTs (B = -1.50, 95% CI [-2.60, -0.39], p < .01). There were persistent practice effects in mean RT (B = -2.16, 95% CI [-2.49, -1.83], p < .001. Log-transformed intra-individual variability in RT increased with higher LL scores (B = 0.01801, 95% CI [0.0049, 0.0311], p < .01) and decreased with rising temperature (B = -0.00754, 95% CI [-0.0119, -0.0032], p < .001). However, after controlling for mean RT, these effects were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: RTs become significantly impaired above a threshold of 4,000 m. Altitude-related changes in RT intra-individual variability were accounted for by mean RT.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of high altitude on reaction time (RT) mean and intra-individual variability. METHOD: Ten students (6 men, 4 women) took a 4-choice RT test and had their vital signs and Lake Louise (LL) score measured on 21 occasions during the Edinburgh Altitude Research Expedition of 2008 to the Western Himalayas (max. altitude 5,565 m). RESULTS: Linear mixed modeling revealed that mean RT was significantly impaired at altitudes above 4,000 m (p < .001), but relatively unaffected below that threshold. An estimated increase in RT between 4,000 and 5,000 m was 15.5 ms, 95% CI [11.1, 19.9]. LL score was related to slower RTs (B = 1.97, 95% CI [0.70, 3.23], p < .01), while number of errors was associated with faster RTs (B = -1.50, 95% CI [-2.60, -0.39], p < .01). There were persistent practice effects in mean RT (B = -2.16, 95% CI [-2.49, -1.83], p < .001. Log-transformed intra-individual variability in RT increased with higher LL scores (B = 0.01801, 95% CI [0.0049, 0.0311], p < .01) and decreased with rising temperature (B = -0.00754, 95% CI [-0.0119, -0.0032], p < .001). However, after controlling for mean RT, these effects were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: RTs become significantly impaired above a threshold of 4,000 m. Altitude-related changes in RT intra-individual variability were accounted for by mean RT.
Authors: Stephan Pramsohler; Stefan Wimmer; Martin Kopp; Hannes Gatterer; Martin Faulhaber; Martin Burtscher; Nikolaus Cristoph Netzer Journal: BMC Neurosci Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Tobias Kammerer; Valentina Faihs; Nikolai Hulde; Andreas Bayer; Max Hübner; Florian Brettner; Walter Karlen; Julia Maria Kröpfl; Markus Rehm; Christina Spengler; Simon Thomas Schäfer Journal: Ann Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-11-19
Authors: Matiram Pun; Veronica Guadagni; Kaitlyn M Bettauer; Lauren L Drogos; Julie Aitken; Sara E Hartmann; Michael Furian; Lara Muralt; Mona Lichtblau; Patrick R Bader; Jean M Rawling; Andrea B Protzner; Silvia Ulrich; Konrad E Bloch; Barry Giesbrecht; Marc J Poulin Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 4.566