Literature DB >> 20437921

Assessment of driving performance using a simulator protocol: validity and reproducibility.

Michel B Bédard1, Marie Parkkari, Bruce Weaver, Julie Riendeau, Mike Dahlquist.   

Abstract

We examined the validity and reproducibility of simulator-based driving evaluations. In Study 1, we examined correlations among Trails A and B, demerit points for simulated drives, and simulator-recorded errors. With one exception, correlations ranged from .44 (p = .103) to .83 (p = .001). In Study 2, we examined correlations among Trail Making Test Part A, Useful Field of View, and demerit points for simulated drives; correlations ranged from .50 to .82 (all ps < .001). The correlation between demerit points for on-road and simulated drives was .74 (p = .035). We examined reproducibility of simulator assessments using the playback function; intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .73 to .87 (all ps < .001). These results suggest that simulators could be used to facilitate the evaluation of fitness to drive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20437921     DOI: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Occup Ther        ISSN: 0272-9490


  21 in total

Review 1.  The role of simulation in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Roberta Rehder; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Kristopher Hooten; Peter Weinstock; Joseph R Madsen; Alan R Cohen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.

Authors:  Sherrilene Classen; Yanning Wang; Alexander M Crizzle; Sandra M Winter; Desiree N Lanford
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

3.  A novel low-cost solution for driving assessment in individuals with and without disabilities.

Authors:  Jakob Rodseth; Edward P Washabaugh; Ali Al Haddad; Paula Kartje; Denise G Tate; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Using Crash Data to Develop Simulator Scenarios for Assessing Novice Driver Performance.

Authors:  Catherine C McDonald; Jason B Tanenbaum; Yi-Ching Lee; Donald L Fisher; Daniel R Mayhew; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  Transp Res Rec       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 1.560

Review 5.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Driving simulation as a performance-based test of visual impairment in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Erwin R Boer; Peter N Rosen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Agreement of driving simulator and on-road driving performance in patients with binocular visual field loss.

Authors:  Judith Ungewiss; Thomas Kübler; Katrin Sippel; Kathrin Aehling; Martin Heister; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Enkelejda Kasneci; Eleni Papageorgiou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Functional Assessment of Driving Capacity of Older Drivers Compared with Non-older Drivers Using Clinical Evaluations and Driving Simulations.

Authors:  Sang Chul Kim; So Yeon Kong; Sang-Yong Eom; Byongho Choe; Seung Jun Hong
Journal:  Ann Geriatr Med Res       Date:  2021-06-08

9.  Is it reliable to assess visual attention of drivers affected by Parkinson's disease from the backseat?-a simulator study.

Authors:  Hoe C Lee; Derserri Yanting Chee; Helena Selander; Torbjorn Falkmer
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2012-02-27

10.  Behavioral and Neurophysiological Signatures of Benzodiazepine-Related Driving Impairments.

Authors:  Bradly T Stone; Kelly A Correa; Timothy L Brown; Andrew L Spurgin; Maja Stikic; Robin R Johnson; Chris Berka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.