Literature DB >> 20437354

Therapeutic alternatives for burst abdomen.

Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst1, Hasan H Eker, Joris J Harlaar, Kirsten J J Nijens, Johannes Jeekel, Johan F Lange.   

Abstract

Burst abdomen is a postoperative complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The risk factors for burst abdomen are patient- and surgery-related. The management of this complication is a relatively unexplored area within the field of surgery. Relevant surgical outcomes include recurrence, mortality, and incisional hernia. A total number of 27 studies are identified that reported on at least one surgical outcome (recurrence, mortality, or incisional hernia rate) of at least 10 patients with burst abdomen. None of the identified studies were designed prospectively, and only a minority of studies reported surgical outcomes of considerable numbers of patients with burst abdomen. Reported conservative management options included use of saline-soaked gauze dressings and negative pressure wound therapy. Operative management options included temporary closure options (open abdomen treatment), primary closure with various suture techniques, closure with application of relaxing incisions, use of synthetic (nonabsorbable and absorbable) and biological meshes, and the use of tissue flaps. The treatment of burst abdomen is associated with unsatisfactory surgical outcome. Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to provide the surgical community with a greater level of evidence for the optimal treatment strategy for burst abdomen and the various subtypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20437354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  9 in total

1.  Intraperitoneal mesh implantation for fascial dehiscence and open abdomen.

Authors:  Moritz Scholtes; Anita Kurmann; Christian A Seiler; Daniel Candinas; Guido Beldi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  "Acute postoperative open abdominal wall": Nosological concept and treatment implications.

Authors:  Manuel López-Cano; José A Pereira; Manuel Armengol-Carrasco
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-27

3.  Simple and safe technique for closure of midline abdominal wound dehiscence.

Authors:  M H Abo-Ryia
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Wound dehiscence: outcome comparison for sutured and mesh reconstructed patients.

Authors:  P Petersson; A Montgomery; U Petersson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Type of incision does not predict abdominal wall outcome after emergency surgery for colonic anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen; Erling Oma; Henrik Harling; Peter-Martin Krarup
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Long-term outcome study in patients with abdominal wound dehiscence: a comparative study on quality of life, body image, and incisional hernia.

Authors:  Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Hasan H Eker; Jan A van der Voet; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Wound Disruption Following Colorectal Operations.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Mark H Hanna; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Alessio Pigazzi; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Management of abdominal wound dehiscence: update of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Denys; Thomas Monbailliu; Mathias Allaeys; Frederik Berrevoet; Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Surgical Tips in Frozen Abdomen Management: Application of Coliseum Technique.

Authors:  Ioannis D Kyriazanos; Dimitrios K Manatakis; Nikolaos Stamos; Christos Stoidis
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-05-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.