Literature DB >> 20437319

Comparison of two approaches to screen for dysphagia among acute ischemic stroke patients: nursing admission screening tool versus National Institutes of Health stroke scale.

Dawn M Bravata1, Virginia S Daggett, Heather Woodward-Hagg, Teresa Damush, Laurie Plue, Scott Russell, George Allen, Linda S Williams, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Neale R Chumbler.   

Abstract

This study assessed the positive and negative predictive values and the sensitivity and specificity of a nursing dysphagia screening tool and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for the identification of dysphagia for veterans hospitalized with ischemic stroke.A secondary objective of this study was to evaluate the speech-language pathology consult rate before and after the nursing admission dysphagia screening tool. This retrospective cohort study evaluated veterans admitted to one Department of Veterans Affairs medical center with ischemic stroke during the 6 months both before and after the implementation of a nursing dysphagia screening tool, which was part of the admission nursing template. Stroke severity was measured with the use of the retrospective NIHSS. Dysphagia diagnosis was based on speech-language pathology evaluations.Dysphagia was present in 38 of 101 patients (38%) with ischemic stroke. The nursing dysphagia screening tool had a positive predictive value of 50% and a negative predictive value of 68%, with a sensitivity of 29% and specificity of 84%. The use of the NIHSS to identify dysphagia risk had a positive predictive value of 60% and a negative predictive value of 84%.The NIHSS had better test characteristics in predicting dysphagia than the nursing dysphagia screening tool. Future research should evaluate the use of the NIHSS as a screening tool for dysphagia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20437319     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.12.0169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  6 in total

Review 1.  Screening for aspiration risk associated with dysphagia in acute stroke.

Authors:  Elizabeth Boaden; Jane Burnell; Lucy Hives; Paola Dey; Andrew Clegg; Mary W Lyons; C Elizabeth Lightbody; Margaret A Hurley; Hazel Roddam; Elizabeth McInnes; Anne Alexandrov; Caroline L Watkins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Stroke, Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, Head Injury, and Pneumonia.

Authors:  Claire Takizawa; Elizabeth Gemmell; James Kenworthy; Renée Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Can a novel clinical risk score improve pneumonia prediction in acute stroke care? A UK multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Craig J Smith; Benjamin D Bray; Alex Hoffman; Andreas Meisel; Peter U Heuschmann; Charles D A Wolfe; Pippa J Tyrrell; Anthony G Rudd
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Enhancing outreach for persons with serious mental illness: 12-month results from a cluster randomized trial of an adaptive implementation strategy.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Daniel Almirall; David E Goodrich; Zongshan Lai; Kristen M Abraham; Kristina M Nord; Nicholas W Bowersox
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Validity and reliability of swallowing screening tools used by nurses for dysphagia: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jiin-Ling Jiang; Shu-Ying Fu; Wan-Hsiang Wang; Yu-Chin Ma
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2016-06-21

6.  Evaluation of the Chinese version of the swallowing screen in stroke patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Jiin-Ling Jiang; Jia-Lun Yu; Jen-Hung Wang; Yao-Yi Wang; Wan-Hsiang Wang
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-09-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.