Literature DB >> 20437177

Seedling biomass partition and water use efficiency of switchgrass and milkvetch in monocultures and mixtures in response to various water availabilities.

Bingcheng Xu1, Xiping Deng, Suiqi Zhang, Lun Shan.   

Abstract

Seedling biomass and allocation, transpiration water use efficiency (TWUE), and species competition between switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and milkvetch (Astragalus adsurgens Pall.) were investigated in a pot-cultivated experiment under different levels of water availability. The experiment was conducted using a simple replacement design in which switchgrass and milkvetch were grown in growth chamber with ten seedlings per pot, in three combinations of the two species (0:10, 5:5 and 10:0). Five water treatments included sufficient water supply (HW), gradual soil drying from HW (DHW), moderate water stress (LW), gradual soil drying from LW (DLW), and re-establishment of LW conditions after 12 days of drying from LW (RLW). Water treatments were applied over a 15-day period. Biomass production and its partitioning, and TWUE were determined at the end of the experiment. Species competitive indices (competitive ratio (CR), aggressivity (A) and relative yield total (RYT)) were calculated from the biomass dry weight data for shoots, roots and total biomass. Water stress significantly reduced seedling biomass production but increased root:shoot ratios in both monocultures and mixtures. In the RLW treatment, only switchgrass monocultures displayed compensatory biomass production and TWUE, while both species demonstrated compensatory growth in the mixture. Switchgrass was the dominant species and much more aggressive than milkvetch in the LW treatment, while in the other four treatments milkvetch was the dominant species as measured by the positive value of aggressivity and higher values of CR. The total biomass RYT values of the two species were higher than 1.0, indicating some degree of resource complimentarity. In the two-species mixture, although the biomass production was lower than that of milkvetch in the monoculture, there was better TWUE, especially under low and fluctuating water availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20437177     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9496-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

Review 1.  [A review on types and mechanisms of compensation effect of crops under water deficit].

Authors:  Liying Zhao; Xiping Deng; Lun Shan
Journal:  Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao       Date:  2004-03

2.  Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland.

Authors:  Yongfei Bai; Xingguo Han; Jianguo Wu; Zuozhong Chen; Linghao Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Differences in the compensatory growth of two co-occurring grass species in relation to water availability.

Authors:  Marja A van Staalduinen; Niels P R Anten
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Environmental and economic analysis of switchgrass production for water quality improvement in northeast Kansas.

Authors:  Richard G Nelson; James C Ascough; Michael R Langemeier
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Human-modified ecosystems and future evolution.

Authors:  D Western
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Long-term productivity of lowland and upland switchgrass cytotypes as affected by cutting frequency.

Authors:  A Monti; G Bezzi; G Pritoni; G Venturi
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Response of five temperate deciduous tree species to water stress.

Authors:  T G Ranney; T H Whitlow; N L Bassuk
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.196

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bioenergy sustainability in China: potential and impacts.

Authors:  Jie Zhuang; Randall W Gentry; Gui-Rui Yu; Gary S Sayler; John W Bickham
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.