Literature DB >> 16338052

Environmental and economic analysis of switchgrass production for water quality improvement in northeast Kansas.

Richard G Nelson1, James C Ascough, Michael R Langemeier.   

Abstract

The primary objectives of this research were to determine SWAT model predicted reductions in four water quality indicators (sediment yield, surface runoff, nitrate nitrogen (NO(3)-N) in surface runoff, and edge-of-field erosion) associated with producing switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) on cropland in the Delaware basin in northeast Kansas, and evaluate switchgrass break-even prices. The magnitude of potential switchgrass water quality payments based on using switchgrass as an alternative energy source was also estimated. SWAT model simulations showed that between 527,000 and 1.27 million metric tons (Mg) of switchgrass could be produced annually across the basin depending upon nitrogen (N) fertilizer application levels (0-224 kg N ha(-1)). The predicted reductions in sediment yield, surface runoff, NO(3)-N in surface runoff, and edge-of-field erosion as a result of switchgrass plantings were 99, 55, 34, and 98%, respectively. The average annual cost per hectare for switchgrass ranged from about 190 US dollars with no N applied to around 345 US dollars at 224 kg N ha(-1) applied. Edge-of-field break-even price per Mg ranged from around 41 US dollars with no N applied to slightly less than 25 US dollars at 224 kg N ha(-1) applied. A majority of the switchgrass produced had an edge-of-field break-even price of 30 Mg(-1) US dollars or less. Savings of at least 50% in each of the four water quality indicators could be attained for an edge-of-field break-even price of 22-27.49 US dollars Mg(-1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16338052     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

1.  Seedling biomass partition and water use efficiency of switchgrass and milkvetch in monocultures and mixtures in response to various water availabilities.

Authors:  Bingcheng Xu; Xiping Deng; Suiqi Zhang; Lun Shan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Opportunities and roadblocks in utilizing forages and small grains for liquid fuels.

Authors:  Gautam Sarath; Robert B Mitchell; Scott E Sattler; Deanna Funnell; Jeffery F Pedersen; Robert A Graybosch; Kenneth P Vogel
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Estimating Nitrogen Load Resulting from Biofuel Mandates.

Authors:  Mohammad Alshawaf; Ellen Douglas; Karen Ricciardi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Switchgrass PvDREB1C plays opposite roles in plant cold and salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco.

Authors:  Wuwu Wen; Zheni Xie; Guohui Yu; Chengliang Zhao; Jing Zhang; Linkai Huang; Bin Xu; Bingru Huang
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops.

Authors:  Matt A Sanderson; Paul R Adler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.