BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate (BP) use has increased dramatically in recent years, becoming an integral part of the overall antineoplastic management of patients with metastatic bone disease. Even though their application has shown to be effective in reducing pain and minimizing the risk of skeletal-related events, their administration may bring also adverse events such osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ). METHODS: After a thorough review of the literature, important aspects of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of ONJ are presented. RESULTS: ONJ is evident in up to 10% of patients receiving intravenous BP treatment. Despite the fact that its exact pathophysiology is unknown, it is characterized by bone necrosis that can occur either spontaneously or after dental surgery or tooth extraction. Panoramic radiographs are useful for the diagnosis and routine assessment of patients and computed tomography can differentiate between ONJ and metastatic disease. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging depicts local disease extension readily, and scintigraphy is the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting early involvement. Preventive measures and routine dental evaluations are essential components of the overall patient management. In the event of ONJ, stage I or II should be managed conservatively, whereas more advanced stages (III and IV) should be treated surgically. CONCLUSION: ONJ is a well-defined clinical entity that all medical and dental doctors should be aware of, since if it is not dealt with readily and effectively, it may deteriorate the clinical status and quality of life of affected patients.
BACKGROUND:Bisphosphonate (BP) use has increased dramatically in recent years, becoming an integral part of the overall antineoplastic management of patients with metastatic bone disease. Even though their application has shown to be effective in reducing pain and minimizing the risk of skeletal-related events, their administration may bring also adverse events such osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ). METHODS: After a thorough review of the literature, important aspects of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of ONJ are presented. RESULTS: ONJ is evident in up to 10% of patients receiving intravenous BP treatment. Despite the fact that its exact pathophysiology is unknown, it is characterized by bone necrosis that can occur either spontaneously or after dental surgery or tooth extraction. Panoramic radiographs are useful for the diagnosis and routine assessment of patients and computed tomography can differentiate between ONJ and metastatic disease. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging depicts local disease extension readily, and scintigraphy is the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting early involvement. Preventive measures and routine dental evaluations are essential components of the overall patient management. In the event of ONJ, stage I or II should be managed conservatively, whereas more advanced stages (III and IV) should be treated surgically. CONCLUSION: ONJ is a well-defined clinical entity that all medical and dental doctors should be aware of, since if it is not dealt with readily and effectively, it may deteriorate the clinical status and quality of life of affected patients.
Authors: M J Rogers; R J Brown; V Hodkin; G M Blackburn; R G Russell; D J Watts Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1996-07-25 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Arno Olthoff; Andreas Ewen; Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Robert Michael Hermann; Hilke Vorwerk; Andrea Hille; Ralph Rödel; Clemens F Hess; Wolfgang Steiner; Olivier Pradier; Hans Christiansen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Lee S Rosen; David Gordon; Simon Tchekmedyian; Ronald Yanagihara; Vera Hirsh; M Krzakowski; M Pawlicki; Paul de Souza; Ming Zheng; Gladys Urbanowitz; Dirk Reitsma; John J Seaman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Aapro; P A Abrahamsson; J J Body; R E Coleman; R Colomer; L Costa; L Crinò; L Dirix; M Gnant; J Gralow; P Hadji; G N Hortobagyi; W Jonat; A Lipton; A Monnier; A H G Paterson; R Rizzoli; F Saad; B Thürlimann Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-09-28 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: J-J Body; I J Diel; M R Lichinitser; E D Kreuser; W Dornoff; V A Gorbunova; M Budde; B Bergström Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: X Wei; S Pushalkar; C Estilo; C Wong; A Farooki; M Fornier; G Bohle; J Huryn; Y Li; S Doty; D Saxena Journal: Oral Dis Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 3.511