Literature DB >> 17906299

Guidance on the use of bisphosphonates in solid tumours: recommendations of an international expert panel.

M Aapro1, P A Abrahamsson, J J Body, R E Coleman, R Colomer, L Costa, L Crinò, L Dirix, M Gnant, J Gralow, P Hadji, G N Hortobagyi, W Jonat, A Lipton, A Monnier, A H G Paterson, R Rizzoli, F Saad, B Thürlimann.   

Abstract

Bisphosphonates (BP) prevent, reduce, and delay cancer-related skeletal complications in patients, and have substantially decreased the prevalence of such events since their introduction. Today, a broad range of BP with differences in potency, efficacy, dosing, and administration as well as approved indications is available. In addition, results of clinical trials investigating the efficacy of BP in cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) have been recently published. The purpose of this paper is to review the current evidence on the use of BP in solid tumours and provide clinical recommendations. An interdisciplinary expert panel of clinical oncologists and of specialists in metabolic bone diseases assessed the widespread evidence and information on the efficacy of BP in the metastatic and nonmetastatic setting, as well as ongoing research on the adjuvant use of BP. Based on available evidence, the panel recommends amino-bisphosphonates for patients with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer and zoledronic acid for patients with other solid tumours as primary disease. Dosing of BP should follow approved indications with adjustments if necessary. While i.v. administration is most often preferable, oral administration (clodronate, IBA) may be considered for breast cancer patients who cannot or do not need to attend regular hospital care. Early-stage cancer patients at risk of developing CTIBL should be considered for preventative BP treatment. The strongest evidence in this setting is now available for ZOL. Overall, BP are well-tolerated, and most common adverse events are influenza-like syndrome, arthralgia, and when used orally, gastrointestinal symptoms. The dose of BP may need to be adapted to renal function and initial creatinine clearance calculation is mandatory according to the panel for use of any BP. Subsequent monitoring is recommended for ZOL and PAM, as described by the regulatory authority guidelines. Patients scheduled to receive BP (mainly every 3-4 weeks i.v.) should have a dental examination and be advised on appropriate measures for reducing the risk of jaw osteonecrosis. BP are well established as supportive therapy to reduce the frequency and severity of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from different cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17906299     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  119 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pathways for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Angela Alistar; Max Sung; Michelle Kim; Randall F Holcombe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

2.  [Castration-resistant prostate cancer: surgical and radio-oncological therapeutic options].

Authors:  S Preusser; P M Putora; L Plasswilm; H P Schmid
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Estrogens in the time of blood-thinners.

Authors:  Yosh Taguchi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  A promising approach for treatment of tumor-induced bone diseases: utilizing bisphosphonate derivatives of nucleoside antimetabolites.

Authors:  Monica M Reinholz; Shawn P Zinnen; Amylou C Dueck; David Dingli; Gregory G Reinholz; Leslie A Jonart; Kathleen A Kitzmann; Amy K Bruzek; Vivian Negron; Abdalla K Abdalla; Bonnie K Arendt; Anthony J Croatt; Luis Sanchez-Perez; David P Sebesta; Harri Lönnberg; Toshiyuki Yoneda; Karl A Nath; Diane F Jelinek; Stephen J Russell; James N Ingle; Thomas C Spelsberg; Henry B F Hal Dixon; Alexander Karpeisky; Wilma L Lingle
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Skeletal imaging effects of pamidronate therapy in osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Anita P Price; Sara J Abramson; Sinchun Hwang; Alexander Chou; Roger Bartolotta; Paul Meyers; Douglas S Katz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-10-30

6.  Guidelines for the management of castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Fred Saad; Sebastien J Hotte
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  A prospective study of bisphosphonate use and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hamed Khalili; Edward S Huang; Shuji Ogino; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew T Chan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Higher incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with anti-angiogenic agents.

Authors:  Jeanny B Aragon-Ching; Yang-Min Ning; Clara C Chen; Lea Latham; Jean-Pierre Guadagnini; James L Gulley; Philip M Arlen; John J Wright; Howard Parnes; William D Figg; William L Dahut
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 9.  [Bisphosphonates for malignant bone tumors].

Authors:  G Holzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jingjing Ma; Sheng Gao; Xiaojian Ni; Fei Chen; Xiaofeng Liu; Hui Xie; Hong Yin; Cheng Lu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.