Literature DB >> 20435936

Propofol reduces the distribution and clearance of midazolam.

Bart Jan Lichtenbelt1, Erik Olofsen, Albert Dahan, Jack W van Kleef, Michel M R F Struys, Jaap Vuyk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Midazolam, at sedative levels, increases blood propofol concentrations by 25%. We evaluated the reverse interaction and determined the influence of propofol on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam.
METHODS: Eight healthy male volunteers were studied on 2 occasions in a random crossover manner. During session A, volunteers received midazolam 0.035 to 0.05 mg x kg(-1) IV for 1 minute followed by an infusion of 0.035 to 0.05 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 59 minutes. During session B, in addition to this midazolam infusion scheme, a target-controlled infusion of propofol (constant C(T): 0.6 or 1.0 microg x mL(-1)) was given from 15 minutes before the start until 6 hours after termination of the midazolam infusion. Arterial blood samples for propofol and midazolam concentration analysis were taken until 6 hours after termination of the midazolam infusion. Nonlinear mixed-effect models examining the influence of propofol and hemodynamic variables on midazolam pharmacokinetics were constructed using Akaike's information-theoretic criterion for model selection.
RESULTS: In the presence of a mean blood propofol concentration of 1.2 microg x mL(-1), the plasma midazolam concentration was increased by 26.9% + or - 9.4% compared with midazolam given as a single drug. Propofol (C(blood): 1.2 microg x mL(-1)) reduced midazolam central volume of distribution from 5.37 to 2.98 L, elimination clearance from 0.39 to 0.31 L x min(-1), and rapid distribution clearance from 2.77 to 2.11 L x min(-1). Inclusion of heart rate further improved the pharmacokinetic model of midazolam.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol reduces the distribution and clearance of midazolam in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, inclusion of heart rate as a covariate improved the pharmacokinetic model of midazolam predominantly through a reduction in the intraindividual variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20435936     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da91bb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

1.  Blood pressure-lowering effects of propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia are not due to enhanced nitric oxide formation or bioavailability.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsikas; Jens Jordan; Stefan Engeli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Circulatory model of vascular and interstitial distribution kinetics of rocuronium: a population analysis in patients.

Authors:  Michael Weiss; Marije Reekers; Jaap Vuyk; Fred Boer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Robust control of burst suppression for medical coma.

Authors:  M Brandon Westover; Seong-Eun Kim; ShiNung Ching; Patrick L Purdon; Emery N Brown
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Effects of Premedication With Midazolam on Recovery and Discharge Times After Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy.

Authors:  Andrew Garcia; Elizabeth A Clark; Sohel Rana; Diego Preciado; George M Jeha; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits; Alan D Kaye; Claude Abdallah
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-03

5.  Safety and efficacy of deep sedation with propofol alone or combined with midazolam administrated by nonanesthesiologist for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Chun; Kyoung Oh Kim; Dong Seon Park; Seong Yeol Kim; Ji Won Park; Il Hyun Baek; Jong Hyeok Kim; Choong Kee Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 6.  Metabolic Profiles of Propofol and Fospropofol: Clinical and Forensic Interpretative Aspects.

Authors:  Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol.

Authors:  Marko M Sahinovic; Michel M R F Struys; Anthony R Absalom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  The effect of an eye mask on midazolam requirement for sedation during spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seon Woo Yoo; Min-Jong Ki; Dal Kim; Yu Jin Oh; Jeongwoo Lee
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.217

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.