Literature DB >> 26020243

Robust control of burst suppression for medical coma.

M Brandon Westover1, Seong-Eun Kim, ShiNung Ching, Patrick L Purdon, Emery N Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical coma is an anesthetic-induced state of brain inactivation, manifest in the electroencephalogram by burst suppression. Feedback control can be used to regulate burst suppression, however, previous designs have not been robust. Robust control design is critical under real-world operating conditions, subject to substantial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameter uncertainty and unpredictable external disturbances. We sought to develop a robust closed-loop anesthesia delivery (CLAD) system to control medical coma. APPROACH: We developed a robust CLAD system to control the burst suppression probability (BSP). We developed a novel BSP tracking algorithm based on realistic models of propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We also developed a practical method for estimating patient-specific pharmacodynamics parameters. Finally, we synthesized a robust proportional integral controller. Using a factorial design spanning patient age, mass, height, and gender, we tested whether the system performed within clinically acceptable limits. Throughout all experiments we subjected the system to disturbances, simulating treatment of refractory status epilepticus in a real-world intensive care unit environment. MAIN
RESULTS: In 5400 simulations, CLAD behavior remained within specifications. Transient behavior after a step in target BSP from 0.2 to 0.8 exhibited a rise time (the median (min, max)) of 1.4 [1.1, 1.9] min; settling time, 7.8 [4.2, 9.0] min; and percent overshoot of 9.6 [2.3, 10.8]%. Under steady state conditions the CLAD system exhibited a median error of 0.1 [-0.5, 0.9]%; inaccuracy of 1.8 [0.9, 3.4]%; oscillation index of 1.8 [0.9, 3.4]%; and maximum instantaneous propofol dose of 4.3 [2.1, 10.5] mg kg(-1). The maximum hourly propofol dose was 4.3 [2.1, 10.3] mg kg(-1) h(-1). Performance fell within clinically acceptable limits for all measures. SIGNIFICANCE: A CLAD system designed using robust control theory achieves clinically acceptable performance in the presence of realistic unmodeled disturbances and in spite of realistic model uncertainty, while maintaining infusion rates within acceptable safety limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020243      PMCID: PMC4517835          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  73 in total

1.  Feedback controlled anesthesia: can the computer replace the anesthesiologist?

Authors:  T W Schnider; A Gentilini; R Wymann
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  2001

2.  Manual versus target-controlled infusions of propofol.

Authors:  D S Breslin; R K Mirakhur; J E Reid; A Kyle
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  General anesthesia, sleep, and coma.

Authors:  Emery N Brown; Ralph Lydic; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Modeling and closed-loop control of hypnosis by means of bispectral index (BIS) with isoflurane.

Authors:  A Gentilini; M Rossoni-Gerosa; C W Frei; R Wymann; M Morari; A M Zbinden; T W Schnider
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Propofol decreases the clearance of midazolam by inhibiting CYP3A4: an in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  N Hamaoka; Y Oda; I Hase; K Mizutani; T Nakamoto; T Ishizaki; A Asada
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  How reliable is the Bispectral Index in critically ill patients? A prospective, comparative, single-blinded observer study.

Authors:  Stanley A Nasraway SA; Eugene C Wu; Ruth M Kelleher; Cynthia M Yasuda; Anne M Donnelly
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Real-time closed-loop control in a rodent model of medically induced coma using burst suppression.

Authors:  ShiNung Ching; Max Y Liberman; Jessica J Chemali; M Brandon Westover; Jonathan D Kenny; Ken Solt; Patrick L Purdon; Emery N Brown
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Treatment of status epilepticus.

Authors:  Hiba Arif; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.420

9.  Treatment of Convulsive and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Trudy Pang; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.972

10.  Propofol infusion syndrome in refractory status epilepticus.

Authors:  Woo Sub Hwang; Hye Min Gwak; Dae-Won Seo
Journal:  J Epilepsy Res       Date:  2013-06-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  A simulation-based comparative analysis of PID and LQG control for closed-loop anesthesia delivery.

Authors:  Sourish Chakravarty; Ayan S Waite; John H Abel; Emery N Brown
Journal:  Proc IFAC World Congress       Date:  2021-04-14

2.  Design, implementation, and evaluation of a physiological closed-loop control device for medically-induced coma.

Authors:  Patrick L Purdon; Ken Solt; Nathaniel M Sims; Emery N Brown; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2017-07

3.  Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus.

Authors:  Jingzhi An; Durga Jonnalagadda; Valdery Moura; Patrick L Purdon; Emery N Brown; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.