BACKGROUND: Kinase inhibition is an increasingly popular strategy for pharmacotherapy of human diseases. Although many of these agents have been described as "targeted therapy", they will typically inhibit multiple kinases with varying potency. Pre-clinical model testing has not predicted the numerous significant toxicities identified during clinical development. The purpose of this study was to develop a bioinformatics-based method to predict specific adverse events (AEs) in humans associated with the inhibition of particular kinase targets (KTs). METHODS: The AE frequencies of protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) were curated from three sources (PubMed, Thompson Physician Desk Reference and PharmGKB), and affinities of 38 PKIs for 317 kinases, representing >50% of the predicted human kinome, were collected from published in vitro assay results. A novel quantitative computational method was developed to predict associations between KTs and AEs that included a whole panel of 71 AEs and 20 PKIs targeting 266 distinct kinases with K(d)<10microM. The method calculated an unbiased, kinome-wide association score via linear algebra on (i) the normalized frequencies of AEs associated with 20 PKIs and (ii) the negative log-transformed dissociation constant of kinases targeted by these PKIs. Finally, a reference standard was calculated by applying Fisher's exact test to the co-occurrence of indexed Pubmed terms (p0.05, and manually verified) for AE and associated kinase targets (AE-KT) pairs from standard literature search techniques. We also evaluated the enrichment of predictions between the quantitative method and the literature search by Fisher's exact testing. RESULTS: We identified significant associations among already empirically well established pairs of AEs (e.g. diarrhea and rash) and KTs (e.g. EGFR). The following less well recognized AE-KT pairs had similar association scores: diarrhea-(DDR1;ERBB4), rash-ERBB4, and fatigue-(CSF1R;KIT). With no filtering, the association score identified 41 prioritized associations involving 7 AEs and 19 KTs. Among them, eight associations were reported in the literature review. There were only 78 out of a total of 4522 AE-KT pairs meeting the evaluation threshold, indicating a strong association between the predicted and the text mined AE-KT pairs (p=3x10(-7)). As many of these drugs remain in development, a larger volume of more detailed data on AE-PKI associations is accessible only through non-public databases. These prediction models will be refined with these data and validated through dedicated prospective human studies. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Our in silico method can predict associations between kinase targets and AE frequencies in human patients. Refining this method should lead to improved clinical development of protein kinase inhibitors, a large new class of therapeutics. http://www.lussierlab.org/publication/PAS/.
BACKGROUND: Kinase inhibition is an increasingly popular strategy for pharmacotherapy of human diseases. Although many of these agents have been described as "targeted therapy", they will typically inhibit multiple kinases with varying potency. Pre-clinical model testing has not predicted the numerous significant toxicities identified during clinical development. The purpose of this study was to develop a bioinformatics-based method to predict specific adverse events (AEs) in humans associated with the inhibition of particular kinase targets (KTs). METHODS: The AE frequencies of protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) were curated from three sources (PubMed, Thompson Physician Desk Reference and PharmGKB), and affinities of 38 PKIs for 317 kinases, representing >50% of the predicted human kinome, were collected from published in vitro assay results. A novel quantitative computational method was developed to predict associations between KTs and AEs that included a whole panel of 71 AEs and 20 PKIs targeting 266 distinct kinases with K(d)<10microM. The method calculated an unbiased, kinome-wide association score via linear algebra on (i) the normalized frequencies of AEs associated with 20 PKIs and (ii) the negative log-transformed dissociation constant of kinases targeted by these PKIs. Finally, a reference standard was calculated by applying Fisher's exact test to the co-occurrence of indexed Pubmed terms (p0.05, and manually verified) for AE and associated kinase targets (AE-KT) pairs from standard literature search techniques. We also evaluated the enrichment of predictions between the quantitative method and the literature search by Fisher's exact testing. RESULTS: We identified significant associations among already empirically well established pairs of AEs (e.g. diarrhea and rash) and KTs (e.g. EGFR). The following less well recognized AE-KT pairs had similar association scores: diarrhea-(DDR1;ERBB4), rash-ERBB4, and fatigue-(CSF1R;KIT). With no filtering, the association score identified 41 prioritized associations involving 7 AEs and 19 KTs. Among them, eight associations were reported in the literature review. There were only 78 out of a total of 4522 AE-KT pairs meeting the evaluation threshold, indicating a strong association between the predicted and the text mined AE-KT pairs (p=3x10(-7)). As many of these drugs remain in development, a larger volume of more detailed data on AE-PKI associations is accessible only through non-public databases. These prediction models will be refined with these data and validated through dedicated prospective human studies. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Our in silico method can predict associations between kinase targets and AE frequencies in humanpatients. Refining this method should lead to improved clinical development of protein kinase inhibitors, a large new class of therapeutics. http://www.lussierlab.org/publication/PAS/.
Authors: Andreas Bender; Josef Scheiber; Meir Glick; John W Davies; Kamal Azzaoui; Jacques Hamon; Laszlo Urban; Steven Whitebread; Jeremy L Jenkins Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Muhammed A Yildirim; Kwang-Il Goh; Michael E Cusick; Albert-László Barabási; Marc Vidal Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Ellin Berman; Maria Nicolaides; Robert G Maki; Martin Fleisher; Suzanne Chanel; Kelly Scheu; Bri-Anne Wilson; Glenn Heller; Nicholas P Sauter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Risto Kerkelä; Luanda Grazette; Rinat Yacobi; Cezar Iliescu; Richard Patten; Cara Beahm; Brian Walters; Sergei Shevtsov; Stéphanie Pesant; Fred J Clubb; Anthony Rosenzweig; Robert N Salomon; Richard A Van Etten; Joseph Alroy; Jean-Bernard Durand; Thomas Force Journal: Nat Med Date: 2006-07-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Martin Lee Miller; Lars Juhl Jensen; Francesca Diella; Claus Jørgensen; Michele Tinti; Lei Li; Marilyn Hsiung; Sirlester A Parker; Jennifer Bordeaux; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; Marina Olhovsky; Adrian Pasculescu; Jes Alexander; Stefan Knapp; Nikolaj Blom; Peer Bork; Shawn Li; Gianni Cesareni; Tony Pawson; Benjamin E Turk; Michael B Yaffe; Søren Brunak; Rune Linding Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Michael Kuhn; Christian von Mering; Monica Campillos; Lars Juhl Jensen; Peer Bork Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Mindy I Davis; Jeremy P Hunt; Sanna Herrgard; Pietro Ciceri; Lisa M Wodicka; Gabriel Pallares; Michael Hocker; Daniel K Treiber; Patrick P Zarrinkar Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2011-10-30 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Rajeshwari R Valiathan; Marta Marco; Birgit Leitinger; Celina G Kleer; Rafael Fridman Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Jennifer L McGuire; John H Hammond; Stefani D Yates; Dongquan Chen; Vahram Haroutunian; James H Meador-Woodruff; Robert E McCullumsmith Journal: Brain Res Date: 2014-04-26 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Young Ji Lee; Andrew D Boyd; Jianrong John Li; Vincent Gardeux; Colleen Kenost; Don Saner; Haiquan Li; Ivo Abraham; Jerry A Krishnan; Yves A Lussier Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: Charles S Cleeland; Jeff D Allen; Samantha A Roberts; Joanna M Brell; Sergio A Giralt; Aarif Y Khakoo; Rebecca A Kirch; Virginia E Kwitkowski; Zhongxing Liao; Jamey Skillings Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Renee A Bouley; Zara Y Weinberg; Helen V Waldschmidt; Yu-Chen Yen; Scott D Larsen; Manojkumar A Puthenveedu; John J G Tesmer Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Eugen Lounkine; Michael J Keiser; Steven Whitebread; Dmitri Mikhailov; Jacques Hamon; Jeremy L Jenkins; Paul Lavan; Eckhard Weber; Allison K Doak; Serge Côté; Brian K Shoichet; Laszlo Urban Journal: Nature Date: 2012-06-10 Impact factor: 49.962