Literature DB >> 20434271

Glasgow Coma Scale and laboratory markers are superior to COHb in predicting CO intoxication severity.

Gerrit Grieb1, David Simons, Linda Schmitz, Andrzej Piatkowski, Oliver Grottke, Norbert Pallua.   

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO) intoxications can affect several organ systems and lead to coma or death in severe cases. To date, COHb is routinely used as a marker for detecting CO intoxication. In this retrospective study, we investigated 173 patients admitted with CO intoxication to our intensive care unit (ICU) over a period of 8 years. Standardised blood tests, chest X-ray and neurological status evaluation were performed on admission and throughout the inpatient treatment. The duration of inpatient treatment was considered to be an indication of the severity of CO-related illness. Interestingly, the data did not reveal a significant correlation between initial COHb level and the duration of inpatient treatment. Instead, a significant inverse correlation was found between the initial Glasgow Coma Scale and the duration of inpatient treatment. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between the duration of inpatient treatment and the occurrence of elevated leucocyte numbers, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) serum concentrations and the presence of lung infiltrates. In conclusion, we postulate that clinical parameters, such as the Glasgow Coma Scale and the laboratory markers CRP and leucocyte count are adequate supportive tools for evaluating the severity of CO-related illness, and further, that the measurement of COHb alone is insufficient for this purpose.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434271     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  7 in total

1.  Implications of alcohol intoxication at the time of burn and smoke inhalation injury: an epidemiologic and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Christopher S Davis; Thomas J Esposito; Anna G Palladino-Davis; Karen Rychlik; Carol R Schermer; Richard L Gamelli; Elizabeth J Kovacs
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 2.  The History of Carbon Monoxide Intoxication.

Authors:  Ioannis-Fivos Megas; Justus P Beier; Gerrit Grieb
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Availability of Bedside and Laboratory Testing for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in the Upper Midwestern United States.

Authors:  Thomas Masters; Brian Willenbring; Bjorn Westgard; Jon Cole; Stephen Hendriksen; Joseph Walter; Christopher Logue; Travis Olives
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-04-16

4.  Prognostic factors of carbon monoxide poisoning in Taiwan: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Ke-Ting Pan; Chih-Hao Shen; Fu-Gong Lin; Yu-Ching Chou; Ben Croxford; Giovanni Leonardi; Kun-Lun Huang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Derivation and Validation of a Score for Predicting Poor Neurocognitive Outcomes in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning.

Authors:  Sung Hwa Kim; Yoonsuk Lee; Soo Kang; Jin Hui Paik; Hyun Kim; Yong Sung Cha
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

6.  Factors Predicting Acute Brain Injury in Cases of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Prospective Registry-Based Study.

Authors:  Hoon Lim; Young Hwan Lee; Sangun Nah; Sungwoo Choi; Young Soon Cho; Gi Woon Kim; Ji Eun Moon; Sangsoo Han
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-05-27

7.  Risk factors for mortality in Asian Taiwanese patients with methanol poisoning.

Authors:  Chen-Yen Lee; Eileen Kevyn Chang; Ja-Liang Lin; Cheng-Hao Weng; Shen-Yang Lee; Kuo-Chang Juan; Huang-Yu Yang; Chemin Lin; Shwu-Hua Lee; I-Kwan Wang; Tzung-Hai Yen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.