Literature DB >> 20434156

Twenty-five years after the FIGO guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring: time for a simplified approach?

Diogo Ayres-de-Campos1, João Bernardes.   

Abstract

Twenty-five years after the FIGO Workshop that produced the "Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring," these remain the only broad international consensus effort in this field. Documents of a similar nature have been produced by national institutions, with subsequent updates of the initial concepts. The 3-class classification system has now been adopted by all the major guidelines, and while there are numerous similar features, and indeed many ideas were inspired by the FIGO guidelines, many key aspects still lack consensus. Making guidelines simpler and more objective may be an important step to guarantee a wide application and assimilation of the recommendations, as well as an enhanced reproducibility and increased memory retention. Copyright (c) 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434156     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  8 in total

1.  Relation of fetal heart rate signals with unassignable baseline to poor neonatal state at birth.

Authors:  A Georgieva; S J Payne; M Moulden; C W G Redman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  An mHealth monitoring system for traditional birth attendant-led antenatal risk assessment in rural Guatemala.

Authors:  Lisa Stroux; Boris Martinez; Enma Coyote Ixen; Nora King; Rachel Hall-Clifford; Peter Rohloff; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2016-10-04

3.  Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Implemented by Dynamic Adaptation of Transmission Power of a Flexible Ultrasound Transducer Array.

Authors:  Paul Hamelmann; Massimo Mischi; Alexander F Kolen; Judith O E H van Laar; Rik Vullings; Jan W M Bergmans
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor.

Authors:  Frida Ekengård; Monika Cardell; Andreas Herbst
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2020-11-25

5.  A deep learning mixed-data type approach for the classification of FHR signals.

Authors:  Edoardo Spairani; Beniamino Daniele; Maria Gabriella Signorini; Giovanni Magenes
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-08

6.  What is the "normal" fetal heart rate?

Authors:  Stephanie Pildner von Steinburg; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Christian Lederer; Stefani Grunow; Sven Schiermeier; Wolfgang Hatzmann; Karl-Theodor M Schneider; Martin Daumer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Improvements in fetal heart rate analysis by the removal of maternal-fetal heart rate ambiguities.

Authors:  Paula Pinto; Cristina Costa-Santos; Hernâni Gonçalves; Diogo Ayres-De-Campos; João Bernardes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Template-based Quality Assessment of the Doppler Ultrasound Signal for Fetal Monitoring.

Authors:  Camilo E Valderrama; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Lisa Stroux; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.