Literature DB >> 20434080

Midwives and normalcy in childbirth: a phenomenologic concept development study.

Jo Anne P Davis1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to explore midwives' understanding of the concept of normalcy as experienced during the care of women during labor and birth.
METHODS: A two-tier, elite sampling strategy was used to identify and enroll participants who showed a strong commitment to normalcy in childbirth care. Thirteen participants completed all study procedures, including individual interviews. Iterative rounds of qualitative analyses were conducted to describe the concept, resulting in the defining aspects of the concept, contextual dynamics that influence its manifestation, and empiric referents.
RESULTS: Midwives experience normalcy in childbirth care as 1) a wide, individualized continuum of variations; 2) interactive with the woman's unique nature, composed of her physiologic capacities and her specific life circumstances; and 3) sensitive and responsive to the contextual environment. DISCUSSION: Midwives' experience of normalcy in childbirth admits a broad continuum of healthy variations, differing from the narrow parameters held in the predominant maternity care culture. Midwives consider the woman's nature and the context of childbirth to be interactive and significant in explaining variations in the woman's childbirth experience. The contextual environment is considered to be the most influential dynamic affecting the normalcy of childbirth. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Nurse-Midwives. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434080     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  3 in total

1.  Iranian midwives' attitudes and beliefs toward physiological childbirth: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Narges Sadeghzadeh; Leila Amiri-Farahani; Shima Haghani; Syedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 2.  Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care.

Authors:  Daphne N McRae; Nazeem Muhajarine; Kathrin Stoll; Maureen Mayhew; Saraswathi Vedam; Deborah Mpofu; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2016-03-18

3.  Can birth outcome inequality be reduced using targeted caseload midwifery in a deprived diverse inner city population? A retrospective cohort study, London, UK.

Authors:  Ruth Hadebe; Paul T Seed; Diana Essien; Kyle Headen; Saheel Mahmud; Salwa Owasil; Cristina Fernandez Turienzo; Carla Stanke; Jane Sandall; Mara Bruno; Nina Khazaezadeh; Eugene Oteng-Ntim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.