Literature DB >> 20433531

Left ventricular geometric abnormality screening in hypertensive patients using a hand-carried ultrasound device.

Galit Perez-Avraham1, Sergio L Kobal, Ohad Etzion, Victor Novack, Talya Wolak, Noah Liel-Cohen, Esther Paran.   

Abstract

The authors assessed the validity of a hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device operated by an internal medicine resident for left ventricular geometric abnormalities (LVGAs) in mild hypertensive patients. LVGAs were diagnosed when at least one of the following was present: left ventricular mass index exceeding 125 g/m(2) and 110 g/m(2) for men and women, respectively; intraventricular septum thickness > or = 10 mm; posterior wall thickness > or = 10 mm; and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter > or = 5.3 mm. For validation, a cardiologist performed standard echocardiography in all patients. A total of 85 patients completed both echocardiographic studies. LVGAs were diagnosed in 19 (22.4%) cases, 18 of which were confirmed by standard echocardiography. Standard echocardiography did not detect any case of LVGA among the hand-carried cardiac ultrasonography LVGA-negative patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the resident's examination were 100% and 98.78%, respectively. Agreement between the two studies was 99% (kappa 0.97, 95% confidence interval). Hand-carried cardiac ultrasonography may be used as a screening tool for LVGA in hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20433531      PMCID: PMC8816462          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00247.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  28 in total

1.  A pilot study of the clinical impact of hand-carried cardiac ultrasound in the medical clinic.

Authors:  Lori B Croft; W Lane Duvall; Martin E Goldman
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 2.  Recommendations for chamber quantification.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack Shanewise; Scott Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William Stewart
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-02-02

3.  A comparison by medicine residents of physical examination versus hand-carried ultrasound for estimation of right atrial pressure.

Authors:  J Matthew Brennan; John E Blair; Sascha Goonewardena; Adam Ronan; Dipak Shah; Samip Vasaiwala; Erica Brooks; Ari Levy; James N Kirkpatrick; Kirk T Spencer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Evaluation of a hand carried cardiac ultrasound device in an outpatient cardiology clinic.

Authors:  E C Vourvouri; D Poldermans; J W Deckers; G E Parharidis; J R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Neurohormonal activity and left ventricular geometry in patients with essential arterial hypertension.

Authors:  M W Muscholl; H Schunkert; F Muders; D Elsner; B Kuch; H W Hense; G A Riegger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Relation of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry to asymptomatic cerebrovascular damage in essential hypertension.

Authors:  K Kohara; B Zhao; Y Jiang; Y Takata; T Fukuoka; M Igase; T Miki; K Hiwada
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  The use of hand-carried ultrasound in the hospital setting--a cost-effective analysis.

Authors:  Kim Greaves; Paramjit Jeetley; Michael Hickman; Girish Dwivedi; Nikant Sabharwal; Tiong Lim; Rajesh Janardhanan; Roxy Senior
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Asymmetric left ventricular remodeling due to isolated septal thickening in patients with systemic hypertension and normal left ventricular masses.

Authors:  P Verdecchia; C Porcellati; I Zampi; G Schillaci; C Gatteschi; M Battistelli; C Bartoccini; C Borgioni; A Ciucci
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan versus atenolol: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study.

Authors:  Peter M Okin; Richard B Devereux; Sverker Jern; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Markku S Nieminen; Steven Snapinn; Katherine E Harris; Peter Aurup; Jonathan M Edelman; Bjorn Dahlof
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Association of change in left ventricular mass with prognosis during long-term antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  M L Muiesan; M Salvetti; D Rizzoni; M Castellano; F Donato; E Agabiti-Rosei
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Focused cardiac ultrasound: where do we stand?

Authors:  Kirk T Spencer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Ultrasound Hypotension Protocol Time-motion Study Using the Multifrequency Single Transducer Versus a Multiple Transducer Ultrasound Device.

Authors:  Linda Sabbadini; Rocco Germano; Emily Hopkins; Jason S Haukoos; John L Kendall
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-08

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of handheld cardiac ultrasound device for assessment of left ventricular structure and function: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sam Jenkins; Samer Alabed; Andrew Swift; Gabriel Marques; Alisdair Ryding; Chris Sawh; James Wardley; Benoy Nalin Shah; Peter Swoboda; Roxy Senior; Robin Nijveldt; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Pankaj Garg
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 5.994

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.