Literature DB >> 20432204

Utilization of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and fecal occult blood test in 11 European countries: evidence from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).

C Stock1, H Brenner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy) and the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) are thought to impact on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. We aimed to estimate prevalences and to investigate potential determinants of utilization of these procedures in the general population across Europe.
METHODS: Data from the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) were used. Prevalences of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and FOBT utilization among adults aged >or= 50 years in 11 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland) were estimated. Potential determinants of utilization of the tests were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Overall, 18 139 individuals were included. The proportion of respondents reporting lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and FOBT utilization within the previous 10 years ranged from 6.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.7 - 6.9; Greece) to 25.1 % (95 %CI 22.1 - 27.2; France) and from 4.1 % (95 %CI 3.2 - 4.9; The Netherlands) to 61.1 % (95 %CI 58.6 - 63.6; Austria), respectively. Observed sex differences were highest in France and Germany; however results were only partly statistically significant. Country, age, education, income, marital status (FOBT only), location of main residence (FOBT only), smoking history, and self-perceived health status were statistically significant predictors of test utilization.
CONCLUSION: Prevalences of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and FOBT utilization vary widely across European countries. They need to be considered in the interpretation of cross-national differences and time trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, and in the design and evaluation of colorectal cancer screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20432204     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  18 in total

1.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Screening rates for colorectal cancer in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Charles N Bernstein; Jewel N Samadder; Rashid Ahmed
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

3.  Small bowel evaluation in asymptomatic fecal immunochemical test-positive patients with a negative colonoscopy: is it necessary?

Authors:  Jae Jun Park; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Awareness and attitudes of Greek medical students on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Athanasios D Sioulas; Stylianos Kalimeris; Persephone Papatheodosiou; Ioannis Karabinis; Olga Agelopoulou; Iosif Beintaris; Dimitrios Polymeros; George Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-11-16

5.  Variation in colorectal cancer testing between primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland.

Authors:  Alexander Leonhard Braun; Emanuele Prati; Yonas Martin; Charles Dvořák; Kali Tal; Nikola Biller-Andorno; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Jacques Cornuz; Kevin Selby; Reto Auer
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Tissue resonance interaction accurately detects colon lesions: A double-blind pilot study.

Authors:  Maria P Dore; Marcello O Tufano; Giovanni M Pes; Marianna Cuccu; Valentina Farina; Alessandra Manca; David Y Graham
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  [Colorectal cancer: role of imaging in screening].

Authors:  T Mang
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  The influence of social determinants on the use of prevention and health promotion services: Results of a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Christian Janßen; Stefanie Sauter; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2012-10-25

10.  Trends in colorectal cancer mortality in Europe: retrospective analysis of the WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Cécile Pizot; Magali Boniol; Matteo Malvezzi; Mathieu Boniol; Eva Negri; Maria Bota; Mark A Jenkins; Harry Bleiberg; Philippe Autier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.