Literature DB >> 20432110

Testing the effects of a decision aid for prostate cancer screening.

Stephanie K Rubel1, Jacqueline W Miller, Robert L Stephens, Ye Xu, Lawrence E Scholl, E Wayne Holden, Leonardo A Stroud, Robert J Volk.   

Abstract

There is an ever-growing trend toward more patient involvement in making health care decisions. This trend has been accompanied by the development of "informed decision-making" interventions to help patients become more engaged and comfortable with making these decisions. We describe the effects of a prostate cancer screening decision aid on knowledge, beliefs about screening, risk perception, control preferences, decisional conflict, and decisional anxiety. Data were collected from 200 males aged 50-70 years in the general population who randomly were assigned to exposure to the decision aid or no exposure as a control condition. A Solomon four-group design was used to test for possible pretest sensitization effects and to assess the effects of exposure to the decision aid. No significant pretest sensitization effects were found. Analysis of the exposure effects found that knowledge increased significantly for those exposed to the decision aid compared with those unexposed. Exposure to the decision aid also had some influence on decreasing both decisional conflict and decisional anxiety. Decision aids can play an important role in increasing patients' knowledge and decreasing anxiety when asked to make health care decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20432110     DOI: 10.1080/10810731003686614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  13 in total

Review 1.  Multicriteria decision analysis in oncology.

Authors:  Georges Adunlin; Vakaramoko Diaby; Alberto J Montero; Hong Xiao
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Informed decision making before prostate-specific antigen screening: Initial results using the American Cancer Society (ACS) Decision Aid (DA) among medically underserved men.

Authors:  Mehmet I Gökce; Xuemei Wang; Jacqueline Frost; Pamela Roberson; Robert J Volk; Durado Brooks; Steven E Canfield; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The perils of ignoring design effects in experimental studies: lessons from a mammography screening trial.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Roshan Bastani; Annette E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2013-01-07

4.  Fostering informed decisions: a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a decision aid among men registered to undergo mass screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Randi M Williams; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Sara N Edmond; Caroline S Dorfman; Marc D Schwartz; John Lynch; Chiledum Ahaghotu; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-01-26

5.  Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Randi M Williams; Kimberly Davis; George Luta; Sofiya Penek; Samantha Barry; Scott Kelly; Catherine Tomko; Marc Schwartz; Alexander H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Mary B Fishman; Carmella Cole; Edward Miller
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Gurpreet K Rana; Sarah Hawley; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Karen Kelly-Blake; Donald E Nease; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Arriba-lib: evaluation of an electronic library of decision aids in primary care physicians.

Authors:  Oliver Hirsch; Heidemarie Keller; Tanja Krones; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Age-Related Use and Perceptions of eHealth in Men With Prostate Cancer: A Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Camella J Rising; Nadine Bol; Gary L Kreps
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2015-06-25

Review 9.  Providing information about options in patient decision aids.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marla L Clayman; B Joyce Davison; Masahito Jimbo; Michel Labrecque; Richard W Martin; Heather Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kimberly R Enard; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Geetanjali R Kamath; Nickell M Dixon; Robert J Volk
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.